Re: [PATCH v5, 12/32] drm/mediatek: add mmsys private data for ddp path config

[CK Hu]

Hi, Yongqiang:

On Fri, 2019-08-30 at 13:27 +0800, CK Hu wrote:
> Hi, Yongqiang:
> 
> On Thu, 2019-08-29 at 22:50 +0800, yongqiang.niu@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > From: Yongqiang Niu <yongqiang.niu@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > This patch add mmsys private data for ddp path config
> > all these register offset and value will be different in future SOC
> > add these define into mmsys private data
> > 	u32 ovl0_mout_en;
> > 	u32 rdma1_sout_sel_in;
> > 	u32 rdma1_sout_dsi0;
> > 	u32 dpi0_sel_in;
> > 	u32 dpi0_sel_in_rdma1;
> > 	u32 dsi0_sel_in;
> > 	u32 dsi0_sel_in_rdma1;
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Yongqiang Niu <yongqiang.niu@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_crtc.c |  4 ++
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp.c  | 86 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp.h  |  5 ++
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_drv.c  |  3 ++
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_drv.h  |  3 ++
> >  5 files changed, 76 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
> > 
> 
> [snip]
> 
> >  
> >  void mtk_ddp_add_comp_to_path(void __iomem *config_regs,
> > +			      const struct mtk_mmsys_reg_data *reg_data,
> >  			      enum mtk_ddp_comp_id cur,
> >  			      enum mtk_ddp_comp_id next)
> >  {
> >  	unsigned int addr, value, reg;
> >  
> > -	value = mtk_ddp_mout_en(cur, next, &addr);
> > +	value = mtk_ddp_mout_en(reg_data, cur, next, &addr);
> >  	if (value) {
> >  		reg = readl_relaxed(config_regs + addr) | value;
> >  		writel_relaxed(reg, config_regs + addr);
> >  	}
> >  
> > -	mtk_ddp_sout_sel(config_regs, cur, next);
> > +	value = mtk_ddp_sout_sel(reg_data, cur, next, &addr);
> > +	if (value)
> > +		writel_relaxed(value, config_regs + addr);
> 
> I think the register could be written inside mtk_ddp_sout_sel(), why do
> you move out of that function?

OK, after review other patch, I understand what you do here.
You want to align the method of mtk_ddp_mout_en(), mtk_ddp_sout_sel(),
and mtk_ddp_sel_in(). so modification in these three function would be
the same style. So I think this alignment should be an independent patch
before this patch.

Regards,
CK

> 
> Regards,
> CK
> 
> >  
> > -	value = mtk_ddp_sel_in(cur, next, &addr);
> > +	value = mtk_ddp_sel_in(reg_data, cur, next, &addr);
> >  	if (value) {
> >  		reg = readl_relaxed(config_regs + addr) | value;
> >  		writel_relaxed(reg, config_regs + addr);
> > @@ -420,18 +455,19 @@ void mtk_ddp_add_comp_to_path(void __iomem *config_regs,
> >  }
> >  
> >  
> >  
>