Re: [PATCH v2 07/15] dt: thermal: tsens: Document interrupt support in tsens driver

[Amit Kucheria]

On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 9:25 PM Stephen Boyd <swboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Quoting Amit Kucheria (2019-08-30 04:32:54)
> > On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 10:04 PM Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 8:23 PM Stephen Boyd <swboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Can we get a known quantity of interrupts for a particular compatible
> > > > string instead? Let's be as specific as possible. The index matters too,
> > > > so please list them in the order that is desired.
> > >
> > > I *think* we can predict what platforms have uplow and critical
> > > interrupts based on IP version currently[1]. For newer interrupt
> > > types, we might need more fine-grained platform compatibles.
> > >
> > > [1] Caveat: this is based only on the list of platforms I've currently
> > > looked at, there might be something internally that breaks these
> > > rules.
> >
> > What do you think if we changed the wording to something like the following,
> >
> > - interrupt-names: Must be one of the following depending on IP version:
> >    For compatibles qcom,msm8916-tsens, qcom,msm8974-tsens,
> > qcom,qcs404-tsens, qcom,tsens-v1, use
> >               interrupt-names = "uplow";
> >    For compatibles qcom,msm8996-tsens, qcom,msm8998-tsens,
> > qcom,sdm845-tsens, qcom,tsens-v2, use
> >               interrupt-names = "uplow", "critical";
>
> Ok. I would still prefer YAML/JSON schema for this binding so that it's
> much more explicit about numbers and the order of interrupts, etc.

OK, I'll look around for some examples.