Re: [PATCH v8 11/24] erofs: introduce xattr & posixacl support

[Christoph Hellwig]

On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 04:20:37PM +0200, David Sterba wrote:
> Oh right, I think the reasons are historical and that we can remove the
> options nowadays. From the compatibility POV this should be safe, with
> ACLs compiled out, no tool would use them, and no harm done when the
> code is present but not used.
> 
> There were some efforts by embedded guys to make parts of kernel more
> configurable to allow removing subsystems to reduce the final image
> size. In this case I don't think it would make any noticeable
> difference, eg. the size of fs/btrfs/acl.o on release config is 1.6KiB,
> while the whole module is over 1.3MiB.

Given that the erofs folks have an actual use case for it I think
it is fine to keep the options, I just wanted to ensure this wasn't
copy and pasted for no good reason.  Note that for XFS we don't have
an option for xattrs, as those are integral to a lot of file system
features.  WE have an ACL option mostly for historic reasons.