Re: [PATCH v4 08/11] lib/vsprintf: Make use of fwnode API to obtain node names and separators

From: Sakari Ailus
Date: Mon Sep 02 2019 - 11:41:57 EST


Hi Petr,

Thanks for the review.

On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 05:18:03PM +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
> On Mon 2019-09-02 11:32:37, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > Instead of implementing our own means of discovering parent nodes, node
> > names or counting how many parents a node has, use the newly added
> > functions in the fwnode API to obtain that information.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > lib/vsprintf.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++----------------------
> > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/lib/vsprintf.c b/lib/vsprintf.c
> > index b00b57f9f911f..a04a2167101ef 100644
> > --- a/lib/vsprintf.c
> > +++ b/lib/vsprintf.c
> > @@ -1863,32 +1864,24 @@ char *flags_string(char *buf, char *end, void *flags_ptr,
> > return format_flags(buf, end, flags, names);
> > }
> >
> > -static const char *device_node_name_for_depth(const struct device_node *np, int depth)
> > -{
> > - for ( ; np && depth; depth--)
> > - np = np->parent;
> > -
> > - return kbasename(np->full_name);
> > -}
> > -
> > static noinline_for_stack
> > -char *device_node_gen_full_name(const struct device_node *np, char *buf, char *end)
> > +char *fwnode_full_name_string(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode, char *buf,
> > + char *end)
> > {
> > int depth;
> > - const struct device_node *parent = np->parent;
> >
> > - /* special case for root node */
> > - if (!parent)
> > - return string_nocheck(buf, end, "/", default_str_spec);
> > + for (depth = fwnode_count_parents(fwnode); depth >= 0; depth--) {
>
> It looked suspicious that it iterated "depth + 1" times. It might be
> obvious for people traversing paths every day but not for me ;-)
> Please, add a comment, for example:
>
> /* Iterate over parents and current node. */
>
> With the above comment:
>
> Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>

Thanks.

How about:

/* Loop starting from the root node to the current node. */

--
Sakari Ailus
sakari.ailus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx