Re: [PATCH] doc:lock: remove reference to clever use of read-write lock
From: Matthew Wilcox
Date: Mon Sep 02 2019 - 22:38:34 EST
On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 02:21:33PM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> On Mon, 02 Sep 2019 21:19:24 +0200
> Federico Vaga <federico.vaga@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > > > I am not used to the mathematical English jargon. It make sense, but then
> > > > I
> > > > would replace it with "If and only if": for clarity.
> > >
> > > While it's used in a number of places and it's pretty common wording
> > > overall in the literature, I agree that we should probably change this in
> > > locking API user facing documentation.
> >
> > I would say not only in locking/. The argument is valid for the entire
> > Documentation/. I wait for Jon's opinion before proceeding.
>
> I don't really have a problem with "iff"; it doesn't seem like *that*
> obscure a term to me. But if you want spell it out, I guess I don't have
> a problem with that. We can change it - iff you send a patch to do it :)
$ git grep -iwc iff Documentation
Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v1/blkio-controller.rst:1
Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v1/cgroups.rst:1
Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v1/freezer-subsystem.rst:2
Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst:1
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/st-rc.txt:2
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/ibm,emac.txt:5
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-st.txt:1
Documentation/driver-api/libata.rst:1
Documentation/features/scripts/features-refresh.sh:1
Documentation/filesystems/directory-locking:1
Documentation/i2c/i2c-topology:3
Documentation/ioctl/hdio.rst:1
Documentation/locking/spinlocks.rst:1
Documentation/locking/ww-mutex-design.rst:1
Documentation/scsi/scsi_eh.txt:2
Documentation/spi/spidev:2
Documentation/trace/ring-buffer-design.txt:1
Documentation/virt/kvm/api.txt:1
Documentation/virt/kvm/halt-polling.txt:1
(29 total)
Of course that doesn't count any in kernel-doc.