Re: [PATCH -next] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Fix build error without CONFIG_PCI_ATS
From: Will Deacon
Date: Tue Sep 03 2019 - 02:30:42 EST
On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 10:42:12AM +0800, YueHaibing wrote:
> If CONFIG_PCI_ATS is not set, building fails:
>
> drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c: In function arm_smmu_ats_supported:
> drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c:2325:35: error: struct pci_dev has no member named ats_cap; did you mean msi_cap?
> return !pdev->untrusted && pdev->ats_cap;
> ^~~~~~~
>
> ats_cap should only used when CONFIG_PCI_ATS is defined,
> so use #ifdef block to guard this.
>
> Fixes: bfff88ec1afe ("iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Rework enabling/disabling of ATS for PCI masters")
> Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
> index 66bf641..44ac9ac 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
> @@ -2313,7 +2313,7 @@ static void arm_smmu_install_ste_for_dev(struct arm_smmu_master *master)
>
> static bool arm_smmu_ats_supported(struct arm_smmu_master *master)
> {
> - struct pci_dev *pdev;
> + struct pci_dev *pdev __maybe_unused;
> struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = master->smmu;
> struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec = dev_iommu_fwspec_get(master->dev);
>
> @@ -2321,8 +2321,10 @@ static bool arm_smmu_ats_supported(struct arm_smmu_master *master)
> !(fwspec->flags & IOMMU_FWSPEC_PCI_RC_ATS) || pci_ats_disabled())
> return false;
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_ATS
> pdev = to_pci_dev(master->dev);
> return !pdev->untrusted && pdev->ats_cap;
> +#endif
> }
Hmm, I really don't like the missing return statement here, even though we
never get this far thanks to the feature not getting set during ->probe().
I'd actually prefer just to duplicate the function:
#ifndef CONFIG_PCI_ATS
static bool
arm_smmu_ats_supported(struct arm_smmu_master *master) { return false; }
#else
<current code here>
#endif
Can you send a v2 like that, please?
Will