Re: [PATCH v3] cpuidle-haltpoll: vcpu hotplug support

From: Rafael J. Wysocki
Date: Tue Sep 03 2019 - 03:38:21 EST

Next message: Michael S. Tsirkin: "[PATCH net-next] vsock/virtio: a better comment on credit update"
Previous message: Christian Borntraeger: "Re: [PATCH v2] s390: vfio-ap: remove unnecessary calls to disable queue interrupts"
In reply to: Marcelo Tosatti: "Re: [PATCH v3] cpuidle-haltpoll: vcpu hotplug support"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 12:18 AM Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 10:34:07PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 12:43 PM Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > When cpus != maxcpus cpuidle-haltpoll will fail to register all vcpus
> > > past the online ones and thus fail to register the idle driver.
> > > This is because cpuidle_add_sysfs() will return with -ENODEV as a
> > > consequence from get_cpu_device() return no device for a non-existing
> > > CPU.
> > >
> > > Instead switch to cpuidle_register_driver() and manually register each
> > > of the present cpus through cpuhp_setup_state() callbacks and future
> > > ones that get onlined or offlined. This mimmics similar logic that
> > > intel_idle does.
> > >
> > > Fixes: fa86ee90eb11 ("add cpuidle-haltpoll driver")
> > > Signed-off-by: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Signed-off-by: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > v3:
> > > * register the teardown callback for correct handling of hotunplug
> > > and error cases. In case cpuhp_setup_state calls fails (e.g. in one of
> > > the cpus that it invoked the callback) it will then call the teardown of
> > > the previously enabled devices; so no need to handle that manually in
> > > haltpoll_uninit().
> > > * use the cpuhp_setup_state() returned dyn allocated state when it
> > > succeeds. And use that state in haltpoll_unint() to call
> > > cpuhp_remove_state() instead of looping online cpus manually. This
> > > is because cpuhp_remove_state() invokes the teardown/offline callback.
> > > * fix subsystem name to 'cpuidle' instead of 'idle' in cpuhp_setup_state()
> >
> > Marcelo, is the R-by still applicable?
> >
> > Paolo, any comments?
> >
> > >
> > > v2:
> > > * move cpus_read_unlock() after unregistering all cpuidle_devices;
> > > (Marcello Tosatti)
> > > * redundant usage of cpuidle_unregister() when only
> > > cpuidle_unregister_driver() suffices; (Marcelo Tosatti)
> > > * cpuhp_setup_state() returns a state (> 0) for CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_DYN
> > > ---
> > > arch/x86/include/asm/cpuidle_haltpoll.h | 4 +-
> > > arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c | 18 +++----
> > > drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-haltpoll.c | 68 +++++++++++++++++++++++--
> > > include/linux/cpuidle_haltpoll.h | 4 +-
> > > 4 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpuidle_haltpoll.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpuidle_haltpoll.h
> > > index ff8607d81526..c8b39c6716ff 100644
> > > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpuidle_haltpoll.h
> > > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpuidle_haltpoll.h
> > > @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
> > > #ifndef _ARCH_HALTPOLL_H
> > > #define _ARCH_HALTPOLL_H
> > >
> > > -void arch_haltpoll_enable(void);
> > > -void arch_haltpoll_disable(void);
> > > +void arch_haltpoll_enable(unsigned int cpu);
> > > +void arch_haltpoll_disable(unsigned int cpu);
> > >
> > > #endif
> > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c b/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c
> > > index 8d150e3732d9..a9b6c4e2446d 100644
> > > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c
> > > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c
> > > @@ -880,32 +880,26 @@ static void kvm_enable_host_haltpoll(void *i)
> > > wrmsrl(MSR_KVM_POLL_CONTROL, 1);
> > > }
> > >
> > > -void arch_haltpoll_enable(void)
> > > +void arch_haltpoll_enable(unsigned int cpu)
> > > {
> > > if (!kvm_para_has_feature(KVM_FEATURE_POLL_CONTROL)) {
> > > - printk(KERN_ERR "kvm: host does not support poll control\n");
> > > - printk(KERN_ERR "kvm: host upgrade recommended\n");
> > > + pr_err_once("kvm: host does not support poll control\n");
> > > + pr_err_once("kvm: host upgrade recommended\n");
> > > return;
> > > }
> > >
> > > - preempt_disable();
> > > /* Enable guest halt poll disables host halt poll */
> > > - kvm_disable_host_haltpoll(NULL);
> > > - smp_call_function(kvm_disable_host_haltpoll, NULL, 1);
> > > - preempt_enable();
> > > + smp_call_function_single(cpu, kvm_disable_host_haltpoll, NULL, 1);
> > > }
> > > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(arch_haltpoll_enable);
> > >
> > > -void arch_haltpoll_disable(void)
> > > +void arch_haltpoll_disable(unsigned int cpu)
> > > {
> > > if (!kvm_para_has_feature(KVM_FEATURE_POLL_CONTROL))
> > > return;
> > >
> > > - preempt_disable();
> > > /* Enable guest halt poll disables host halt poll */
> > > - kvm_enable_host_haltpoll(NULL);
> > > - smp_call_function(kvm_enable_host_haltpoll, NULL, 1);
> > > - preempt_enable();
> > > + smp_call_function_single(cpu, kvm_enable_host_haltpoll, NULL, 1);
> > > }
> > > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(arch_haltpoll_disable);
> > > #endif
> > > diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-haltpoll.c b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-haltpoll.c
> > > index 9ac093dcbb01..56d8ab814466 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-haltpoll.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-haltpoll.c
> > > @@ -11,12 +11,16 @@
> > > */
> > >
> > > #include <linux/init.h>
> > > +#include <linux/cpu.h>
> > > #include <linux/cpuidle.h>
> > > #include <linux/module.h>
> > > #include <linux/sched/idle.h>
> > > #include <linux/kvm_para.h>
> > > #include <linux/cpuidle_haltpoll.h>
> > >
> > > +static struct cpuidle_device __percpu *haltpoll_cpuidle_devices;
> > > +static enum cpuhp_state haltpoll_hp_state;
> > > +
> > > static int default_enter_idle(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
> > > struct cpuidle_driver *drv, int index)
> > > {
> > > @@ -46,6 +50,46 @@ static struct cpuidle_driver haltpoll_driver = {
> > > .state_count = 2,
> > > };
> > >
> > > +static int haltpoll_cpu_online(unsigned int cpu)
> > > +{
> > > + struct cpuidle_device *dev;
> > > +
> > > + dev = per_cpu_ptr(haltpoll_cpuidle_devices, cpu);
> > > + if (!dev->registered) {
> > > + dev->cpu = cpu;
> > > + if (cpuidle_register_device(dev)) {
> > > + pr_notice("cpuidle_register_device %d failed!\n", cpu);
> > > + return -EIO;
> > > + }
> > > + arch_haltpoll_enable(cpu);
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static int haltpoll_cpu_offline(unsigned int cpu)
> > > +{
> > > + struct cpuidle_device *dev;
> > > +
> > > + dev = per_cpu_ptr(haltpoll_cpuidle_devices, cpu);
> > > + if (dev->registered) {
> > > + arch_haltpoll_disable(cpu);
> > > + cpuidle_unregister_device(dev);
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static void haltpoll_uninit(void)
> > > +{
> > > + if (haltpoll_hp_state)
> > > + cpuhp_remove_state(haltpoll_hp_state);
> > > + cpuidle_unregister_driver(&haltpoll_driver);
> > > +
> > > + free_percpu(haltpoll_cpuidle_devices);
> > > + haltpoll_cpuidle_devices = NULL;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > static int __init haltpoll_init(void)
> > > {
> > > int ret;
> > > @@ -56,17 +100,31 @@ static int __init haltpoll_init(void)
> > > if (!kvm_para_available())
> > > return 0;
> > >
> > > - ret = cpuidle_register(&haltpoll_driver, NULL);
> > > - if (ret == 0)
> > > - arch_haltpoll_enable();
> > > + ret = cpuidle_register_driver(drv);
> > > + if (ret < 0)
> > > + return ret;
> > > +
> > > + haltpoll_cpuidle_devices = alloc_percpu(struct cpuidle_device);
> > > + if (haltpoll_cpuidle_devices == NULL) {
> > > + cpuidle_unregister_driver(drv);
> > > + return -ENOMEM;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + ret = cpuhp_setup_state(CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_DYN, "cpuidle/haltpoll:online",
> > > + haltpoll_cpu_online, haltpoll_cpu_offline);
> > > + if (ret < 0) {
> > > + haltpoll_uninit();
> > > + } else {
> > > + haltpoll_hp_state = ret;
> > > + ret = 0;
> > > + }
> > >
> > > return ret;
> > > }
> > >
> > > static void __exit haltpoll_exit(void)
> > > {
> > > - arch_haltpoll_disable();
> > > - cpuidle_unregister(&haltpoll_driver);
> > > + haltpoll_uninit();
> > > }
> > >
> > > module_init(haltpoll_init);
> > > diff --git a/include/linux/cpuidle_haltpoll.h b/include/linux/cpuidle_haltpoll.h
> > > index fe5954c2409e..d50c1e0411a2 100644
> > > --- a/include/linux/cpuidle_haltpoll.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/cpuidle_haltpoll.h
> > > @@ -5,11 +5,11 @@
> > > #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_CPUIDLE_HALTPOLL
> > > #include <asm/cpuidle_haltpoll.h>
> > > #else
> > > -static inline void arch_haltpoll_enable(void)
> > > +static inline void arch_haltpoll_enable(unsigned int cpu)
> > > {
> > > }
> > >
> > > -static inline void arch_haltpoll_disable(void)
> > > +static inline void arch_haltpoll_disable(unsigned int cpu)
> > > {
> > > }
> > > #endif
> > > --
> > > 2.17.1
> > >
>
> Reviewed-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@xxxxxxxxxx>

OK, queued for v5.4, thanks!

Next message: Michael S. Tsirkin: "[PATCH net-next] vsock/virtio: a better comment on credit update"
Previous message: Christian Borntraeger: "Re: [PATCH v2] s390: vfio-ap: remove unnecessary calls to disable queue interrupts"
In reply to: Marcelo Tosatti: "Re: [PATCH v3] cpuidle-haltpoll: vcpu hotplug support"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]