RE: [PATCH] ACPI: support for NXP i2c controller
From: Meenakshi Aggarwal
Date: Tue Sep 03 2019 - 07:08:15 EST
+biwen
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 3, 2019 4:20 PM
> To: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@xxxxxxxxxx>; Chuanhua Han
> <chuanhua.han@xxxxxxx>; Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Andy
> Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Len Brown <lenb@xxxxxxxxxx>;
> Shawn Guo <shawnguo@xxxxxxxxxx>; Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
> ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Linux Kernel Mailing List
> <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; linux-i2c <linux-i2c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Linux
> ARM <linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Leo Li <leoyang.li@xxxxxxx>;
> Meenakshi Aggarwal <meenakshi.aggarwal@xxxxxxx>; Udit Kumar
> <udit.kumar@xxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI: support for NXP i2c controller
>
> One more question,
>
> On 02.09.19 22:56, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 12:35 PM Chuanhua Han <chuanhua.han@xxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Enable NXP i2c controller to boot with ACPI
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Meenakshi Aggarwal <meenakshi.aggarwal@xxxxxxx>
> >> Signed-off-by: Udit Kumar <udit.kumar@xxxxxxx>
> >> Signed-off-by: Chuanhua Han <chuanhua.han@xxxxxxx>
> >
> > Wolfram, any objections to this from the i2c side?
> >
> >> ---
> >> drivers/acpi/acpi_apd.c | 6 ++++++
> >> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
> >> 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_apd.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_apd.c index
> >> ff47317..cf8566c 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_apd.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_apd.c
> >> @@ -165,6 +165,11 @@ static const struct apd_device_desc
> thunderx2_i2c_desc = {
> >> .fixed_clk_rate = 125000000,
> >> };
> >>
> >> +static const struct apd_device_desc nxp_i2c_desc = {
> >> + .setup = acpi_apd_setup,
> >> + .fixed_clk_rate = 350000000,
> >> +};
>
> I'm not ACPI expert, so need here some help for understanding. Here is ACPI
> table for
> NXP0001 id (found on the internet):
> + Device(I2C0) {
> + Name(_HID, "NXP0001")
> + Name(_UID, 0)
> + Name(_CRS, ResourceTemplate() {
> + Memory32Fixed(ReadWrite, I2C0_BASE, I2C_LEN)
> + Interrupt(ResourceConsumer, Level, ActiveHigh, Shared) { I2C0_IT }
> + }) // end of _CRS for i2c0 device
> + Name (_DSD, Package () {
> + ToUUID("daffd814-6eba-4d8c-8a91-bc9bbf4aa301"),
> + Package () {
> + Package () {"clock-frequency", DEFAULT_PLAT_FREQ}, //This is
> + device specific
> data, Need to see how to pass clk stuff
> + }
> + })
>
> Should kernel some how get proper clock-frequency from the ACPI? Or we still
> need to use hard coded .fixed_clk_rate in the kernel?
>
>
> >> static const struct apd_device_desc hip08_spi_desc = {
> >> .setup = acpi_apd_setup,
> >> .fixed_clk_rate = 250000000,
> >> @@ -238,6 +243,7 @@ static const struct acpi_device_id
> acpi_apd_device_ids[] = {
> >> { "HISI02A1", APD_ADDR(hip07_i2c_desc) },
> >> { "HISI02A2", APD_ADDR(hip08_i2c_desc) },
> >> { "HISI0173", APD_ADDR(hip08_spi_desc) },
> >> + { "NXP0001", APD_ADDR(nxp_i2c_desc) },
> >> #endif
> >> { }
> >> };
> >> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c
> >> index b1b8b93..99f9b96 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c
> >> @@ -44,6 +44,7 @@
> >> #include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
> >> #include <linux/sched.h>
> >> #include <linux/slab.h>
> >> +#include <linux/acpi.h>
> >>
> >> /* This will be the driver name the kernel reports */
> >> #define DRIVER_NAME "imx-i2c"
> >> @@ -255,6 +256,12 @@ static const struct of_device_id i2c_imx_dt_ids[] = {
> >> };
> >> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, i2c_imx_dt_ids);
> >>
> >> +static const struct acpi_device_id i2c_imx_acpi_ids[] = {
> >> + {"NXP0001", .driver_data = (kernel_ulong_t)&vf610_i2c_hwdata},
> >> + { }
> >> +};
> >> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, i2c_imx_acpi_ids);
> >> +
> >> static inline int is_imx1_i2c(struct imx_i2c_struct *i2c_imx)
> >> {
> >> return i2c_imx->hwdata->devtype == IMX1_I2C;
> >> @@ -1052,6 +1059,9 @@ static int i2c_imx_probe(struct platform_device
> *pdev)
> >> {
> >> const struct of_device_id *of_id = of_match_device(i2c_imx_dt_ids,
> >> &pdev->dev);
> >> + const struct acpi_device_id *acpi_id =
> >> + acpi_match_device(i2c_imx_acpi_ids,
> >> + &pdev->dev);
> >> struct imx_i2c_struct *i2c_imx;
> >> struct resource *res;
> >> struct imxi2c_platform_data *pdata = dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev);
> >> @@ -1079,6 +1089,9 @@ static int i2c_imx_probe(struct platform_device
> *pdev)
> >>
> >> if (of_id)
> >> i2c_imx->hwdata = of_id->data;
> >> + else if (acpi_id)
> >> + i2c_imx->hwdata = (struct imx_i2c_hwdata *)
> >> + acpi_id->driver_data;
> >> else
> >> i2c_imx->hwdata = (struct imx_i2c_hwdata *)
> >> platform_get_device_id(pdev)->driver_data;
> >> @@ -1091,6 +1104,7 @@ static int i2c_imx_probe(struct platform_device
> *pdev)
> >> i2c_imx->adapter.nr = pdev->id;
> >> i2c_imx->adapter.dev.of_node = pdev->dev.of_node;
> >> i2c_imx->base = base;
> >> + ACPI_COMPANION_SET(&i2c_imx->adapter.dev,
> ACPI_COMPANION(&pdev->dev));
> >>
> >> /* Get I2C clock */
> >> i2c_imx->clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);
> >> @@ -1253,6 +1267,7 @@ static struct platform_driver i2c_imx_driver = {
> >> .name = DRIVER_NAME,
> >> .pm = &i2c_imx_pm_ops,
> >> .of_match_table = i2c_imx_dt_ids,
> >> + .acpi_match_table = ACPI_PTR(i2c_imx_acpi_ids),
> >> },
> >> .id_table = imx_i2c_devtype,
> >> };
> >> --
> >> 2.9.5
> >>
> >
>
> Kind regards,
> Oleksij Rempel
>
> --
> Pengutronix e.K. | |
> Industrial Linux Solutions |
> https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.pen
> gutronix.de%2F&data=02%7C01%7Cmeenakshi.aggarwal%40nxp.com%7C
> 53801e593fbc47606f1d08d7305c8024%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c30163
> 5%7C0%7C0%7C637031046148090453&sdata=PkS19Tph5n4gMcAJaG3sKs
> ROkOm%2BhoUykGRdYy0PUOc%3D&reserved=0 |
> Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
> Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |