Re: [PATCH -next v2] sched/fair: fix -Wunused-but-set-variable warnings

[Qian Cai]

Ingo or Peter, please take a look at this trivial patch. Still see the warning
in linux-next every day.

On Tue, 2019-08-20 at 14:40 -0400, Qian Cai wrote:
> The linux-next commit "sched/fair: Fix low cpu usage with high
> throttling by removing expiration of cpu-local slices" [1] introduced a
> few compilation warnings,
> 
> kernel/sched/fair.c: In function '__refill_cfs_bandwidth_runtime':
> kernel/sched/fair.c:4365:6: warning: variable 'now' set but not used
> [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
> kernel/sched/fair.c: In function 'start_cfs_bandwidth':
> kernel/sched/fair.c:4992:6: warning: variable 'overrun' set but not used
> [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
> 
> Also, __refill_cfs_bandwidth_runtime() does no longer update the
> expiration time, so fix the comments accordingly.
> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1558121424-2914-1-git-send-email-chiluk+linux
> @indeed.com/
> 
> Signed-off-by: Qian Cai <cai@xxxxxx>
> ---
> 
> v2: Keep hrtimer_forward_now() in start_cfs_bandwidth() per Ben.
> 
> Âkernel/sched/fair.c | 19 ++++++-------------
> Â1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index 84959d3285d1..06782491691f 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -4354,21 +4354,16 @@ static inline u64 sched_cfs_bandwidth_slice(void)
> Â}
> Â
> Â/*
> - * Replenish runtime according to assigned quota and update expiration time.
> - * We use sched_clock_cpu directly instead of rq->clock to avoid adding
> - * additional synchronization around rq->lock.
> + * Replenish runtime according to assigned quota. We use sched_clock_cpu
> + * directly instead of rq->clock to avoid adding additional synchronization
> + * around rq->lock.
> Â *
> Â * requires cfs_b->lock
> Â */
> Âvoid __refill_cfs_bandwidth_runtime(struct cfs_bandwidth *cfs_b)
> Â{
> -	u64 now;
> -
> -	if (cfs_b->quota == RUNTIME_INF)
> -		return;
> -
> -	now = sched_clock_cpu(smp_processor_id());
> -	cfs_b->runtime = cfs_b->quota;
> +	if (cfs_b->quota != RUNTIME_INF)
> +		cfs_b->runtime = cfs_b->quota;
> Â}
> Â
> Âstatic inline struct cfs_bandwidth *tg_cfs_bandwidth(struct task_group *tg)
> @@ -4989,15 +4984,13 @@ static void init_cfs_rq_runtime(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
> Â
> Âvoid start_cfs_bandwidth(struct cfs_bandwidth *cfs_b)
> Â{
> -	u64 overrun;
> -
> Â	lockdep_assert_held(&cfs_b->lock);
> Â
> Â	if (cfs_b->period_active)
> Â		return;
> Â
> Â	cfs_b->period_active = 1;
> -	overrun = hrtimer_forward_now(&cfs_b->period_timer, cfs_b->period);
> +	hrtimer_forward_now(&cfs_b->period_timer, cfs_b->period);
> Â	hrtimer_start_expires(&cfs_b->period_timer, HRTIMER_MODE_ABS_PINNED);
> Â}
> Â