Re: [PATCH] net/mlx5: Use PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO rather than its implementation

From: Saeed Mahameed
Date: Wed Sep 04 2019 - 19:29:23 EST


On Tue, 2019-09-03 at 20:08 +0000, Saeed Mahameed wrote:
> On Tue, 2019-09-03 at 14:56 +0800, zhong jiang wrote:
> > PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO contains if(IS_ERR(...)) + PTR_ERR. It is better
> > to use it directly. hence just replace it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: zhong jiang <zhongjiang@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c | 5 +----
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c
> > b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c
> > index 5581a80..2e0b467 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c
> > @@ -989,10 +989,7 @@ static void mlx5e_hairpin_flow_del(struct
> > mlx5e_priv *priv,
> > &flow_act, dest, dest_ix);
> > mutex_unlock(&priv->fs.tc.t_lock);
> >
> > - if (IS_ERR(flow->rule[0]))
> > - return PTR_ERR(flow->rule[0]);
> > -
> > - return 0;
> > + return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(flow->rule[0]);
> > }
> >
> > static void mlx5e_tc_del_nic_flow(struct mlx5e_priv *priv,
>
> Acked-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

Applied to net-next-mlx5 as i have a cleanup series coming up soon.

Thanks,
Saeed.