Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: mt8183: Add node for the Mali GPU

From: Nicolas Boichat
Date: Thu Sep 05 2019 - 05:49:33 EST

Thanks for the quick review!

On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 5:09 PM Rob Herring <robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 9:16 AM Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Add a basic GPU node and opp table for mt8183.
> >
> > The binding we use with out-of-tree Mali drivers includes more
> > clocks, I assume this would be required eventually if we have an
> > in-tree driver:
>
> We have an in-tree driver...

Right but AFAICT it does not support Bifrost GPU (yet?).

>
> > clocks =
> > <&topckgen CLK_TOP_MFGPLL_CK>,
> > <&topckgen CLK_TOP_MUX_MFG>,
> > <&clk26m>,
> > <&mfgcfg CLK_MFG_BG3D>;
> > clock-names =
> > "clk_main_parent",
> > "clk_mux",
> > "clk_sub_parent",
> > "subsys_mfg_cg";

Do you think we should add those to the binding document? May not be
easy to match what the amlogic binding does (I'm not sure to
understand the details of this device, but I can dig further/ask).

> >
> > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > ---
> > Upstreaming what matches existing bindings from our Chromium OS tree:
> > https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromiumos/third_party/kernel/+/chromeos-4.19/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8183.dtsi#1348
> >
> > The evb part of this change depends on this patch to add PMIC dtsi:
> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10928161/
> >
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8183-evb.dts | 7 ++
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8183.dtsi | 103 ++++++++++++++++++++
> > 2 files changed, 110 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8183-evb.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8183-evb.dts
> > index 1fb195c683c3d01..200d8e65a6368a1 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8183-evb.dts
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8183-evb.dts
> > @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
> >
> > /dts-v1/;
> > #include "mt8183.dtsi"
> > +#include "mt6358.dtsi"
> >
> > / {
> > model = "MediaTek MT8183 evaluation board";
> > @@ -30,6 +31,12 @@
> > status = "okay";
> > };
> >
> > +&gpu {
> > + supply-names = "mali", "mali_sram";
> > + mali-supply = <&mt6358_vgpu_reg>;
> > + mali_sram-supply = <&mt6358_vsram_gpu_reg>;
>
> Not documented. Just 'sram-supply' is enough.

Will fix.

> Note that the binding doc queued up for 5.4 has been converted to DT schema.

Yep I see that in linux-next.

>
> > +};
> > +
> > &i2c0 {
> > pinctrl-names = "default";
> > pinctrl-0 = <&i2c_pins_0>;
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8183.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8183.dtsi
> > index 97f84aa9fc6e1c1..8ea548a762ea252 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8183.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8183.dtsi
> > @@ -579,6 +579,109 @@
> > #clock-cells = <1>;
> > };
> >
> > + gpu: mali@13040000 {
>
> gpu@...
>
> > + compatible = "mediatek,mt8183-mali", "arm,mali-bifrost";
>
> You need to add this compatible string too.

Will do.

>
> > + reg = <0 0x13040000 0 0x4000>;
> > + interrupts =
> > + <GIC_SPI 280 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW>,
> > + <GIC_SPI 279 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW>,
> > + <GIC_SPI 278 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW>;
> > + interrupt-names = "job", "mmu", "gpu";
> > +
> > + clocks = <&topckgen CLK_TOP_MFGPLL_CK>;
> > + power-domains =
> > + <&scpsys MT8183_POWER_DOMAIN_MFG_CORE0>,
> > + <&scpsys MT8183_POWER_DOMAIN_MFG_CORE1>,
> > + <&scpsys MT8183_POWER_DOMAIN_MFG_2D>;
>
> This needs to be documented too.

I see that Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-midgard.yaml
has power-domains in the example both not in the yaml, is that
expected?


>
> > +
> > + operating-points-v2 = <&gpu_opp_table>;
> > + };
> > +
> > + gpu_opp_table: opp_table0 {
> > + compatible = "operating-points-v2";
> > + opp-shared;
> > +
> > + opp-300000000 {
> > + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <300000000>;
> > + opp-microvolt = <625000>, <850000>;
> > + };
> > +
> > + opp-320000000 {
> > + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <320000000>;
> > + opp-microvolt = <631250>, <850000>;
> > + };
> > +
> > + opp-340000000 {
> > + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <340000000>;
> > + opp-microvolt = <637500>, <850000>;
> > + };
> > +
> > + opp-360000000 {
> > + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <360000000>;
> > + opp-microvolt = <643750>, <850000>;
> > + };
> > +
> > + opp-380000000 {
> > + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <380000000>;
> > + opp-microvolt = <650000>, <850000>;
> > + };
> > +
> > + opp-400000000 {
> > + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <400000000>;
> > + opp-microvolt = <656250>, <850000>;
> > + };
> > +
> > + opp-420000000 {
> > + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <420000000>;
> > + opp-microvolt = <662500>, <850000>;
> > + };
> > +
> > + opp-460000000 {
> > + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <460000000>;
> > + opp-microvolt = <675000>, <850000>;
> > + };
> > +
> > + opp-500000000 {
> > + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <500000000>;
> > + opp-microvolt = <687500>, <850000>;
> > + };
> > +
> > + opp-540000000 {
> > + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <540000000>;
> > + opp-microvolt = <700000>, <850000>;
> > + };
> > +
> > + opp-580000000 {
> > + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <580000000>;
> > + opp-microvolt = <712500>, <850000>;
> > + };
> > +
> > + opp-620000000 {
> > + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <620000000>;
> > + opp-microvolt = <725000>, <850000>;
> > + };
> > +
> > + opp-653000000 {
> > + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <653000000>;
> > + opp-microvolt = <743750>, <850000>;
> > + };
> > +
> > + opp-698000000 {
> > + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <698000000>;
> > + opp-microvolt = <768750>, <868750>;
> > + };
> > +
> > + opp-743000000 {
> > + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <743000000>;
> > + opp-microvolt = <793750>, <893750>;
> > + };
> > +
> > + opp-800000000 {
> > + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <800000000>;
> > + opp-microvolt = <825000>, <925000>;
> > + };
>
> Okay, but I seriously doubt the OPP selection logic is sophisticated
> enough or will ever be to use all these levels...
>
> > + };
> > +
> > mmsys: syscon@14000000 {
> > compatible = "mediatek,mt8183-mmsys", "syscon";
> > reg = <0 0x14000000 0 0x1000>;
> > --
> > 2.23.0.187.g17f5b7556c-goog
> >