Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] dt-bindings: clock: Document the parent clocks

[Stephen Boyd]

Quoting Vinod Koul (2019-08-26 05:14:50)
> With clock parent data scheme we must specify the parent clocks for the
> rpmhcc nodes. So describe the parent clock for rpmhcc in the bindings.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,rpmh-clk.txt | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,rpmh-clk.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,rpmh-clk.txt
> index 3c007653da31..8b97968f9c88 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,rpmh-clk.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,rpmh-clk.txt
> @@ -9,6 +9,9 @@ Required properties :
>  - compatible : shall contain "qcom,sdm845-rpmh-clk"
>  
>  - #clock-cells : must contain 1
> +- clocks: a list of phandles and clock-specifier pairs,
> +         one for each entry in clock-names.
> +- clock-names: Parent board clock: "xo".

Ok. xo is fine!