Re: [Letux-kernel] [RFC PATCH 0/3] Enable 1GHz support on omap36xx

From: Adam Ford
Date: Wed Sep 11 2019 - 08:43:17 EST

Next message: tiantao6: "[PATCH] PCI: vc: fix warning: no previous prototype"
Previous message: David Hildenbrand: "Re: [PATCH v9 0/8] stg mail -e --version=v9 \"
In reply to: H. Nikolaus Schaller: "Re: [Letux-kernel] [RFC PATCH 0/3] Enable 1GHz support on omap36xx"
Next in thread: H. Nikolaus Schaller: "Re: [Letux-kernel] [RFC PATCH 0/3] Enable 1GHz support on omap36xx"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 1:50 AM H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> > Am 11.09.2019 um 08:03 schrieb H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> >
> >
> >> Am 11.09.2019 um 07:13 schrieb H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> >>
> >> Hi Adam,
> >>
> >>> Am 11.09.2019 um 02:41 schrieb Adam Ford <aford173@xxxxxxxxx>:
> >>>>>>
> >>
> >>>>>> The error message looks as if we have to enable multi_regulator.
> >>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> That will enable both vdd and vbb regulators from what I can tell in the driver.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> And that may need to rename cpu0-supply to vdd-supply (unless the
> >>>>>> names can be configured).
> >>>>>
> >>>>> That is consistent with what I found. vdd-supply = <&vcc>; and
> >>>>> vbb-supply = <&abb_mpu_iva>;
> >>>>> I put them both under the cpu node. Unfortunately, when I did that,
> >>>>> my board crashed.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I am thinking it has something to do with the abb_mpu_iva driver
> >>>>> because until this point, we've always operated at 800MHz or lower
> >>>>> which all have the same behavior in abb_mpu_iva.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> With the patch you posted for the regulator, without the update to
> >>>>> cpufreq, and with debugging enabled, I received the following in
> >>>>> dmesg:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> [ 1.112518] ti_abb 483072f0.regulator-abb-mpu: Missing
> >>>>> 'efuse-address' IO resource
> >>>>> [ 1.112579] ti_abb 483072f0.regulator-abb-mpu: [0]v=1012500 ABB=0
> >>>>> ef=0x0 rbb=0x0 fbb=0x0 vset=0x0
> >>>>> [ 1.112609] ti_abb 483072f0.regulator-abb-mpu: [1]v=1200000 ABB=0
> >>>>> ef=0x0 rbb=0x0 fbb=0x0 vset=0x0
> >>>>> [ 1.112609] ti_abb 483072f0.regulator-abb-mpu: [2]v=1325000 ABB=0
> >>>>> ef=0x0 rbb=0x0 fbb=0x0 vset=0x0
> >>>>> [ 1.112640] ti_abb 483072f0.regulator-abb-mpu: [3]v=1375000 ABB=1
> >>>>> ef=0x0 rbb=0x0 fbb=0x0 vset=0x0
> >>>>> [ 1.112731] ti_abb 483072f0.regulator-abb-mpu: ti_abb_init_timings:
> >>>>> Clk_rate=13000000, sr2_cnt=0x00000032
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Using an unmodified kernel, I changed the device tree to make the abb
> >>>> regulator power the cpu instead of vcc. After doing so, I was able to
> >>>> read the microvolt value, and it matched the processor's desired OPP
> >>>> voltage, and the debug code showed the abb regulator was attempting to
> >>>> set the various index based on the needed voltage. I think the abb
> >>>> driver is working correctly.
> >>>>
> >>>> I think tomorrow, I will re-apply the patches and tweak it again to
> >>>> support both vdd and vbb regulators. If it crashes again, I'll look
> >>>> more closely at the logs to see if I can determine why. I think it's
> >>>> pretty close. I also need to go back and find the SmartReflex stuff
> >>>> as well.
> >>>>
> >>> Well, I couldn't give it up for the night, so I thought I'd show my data dump
> >>>
> >>> [ 9.807647] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> >>> [ 9.812469] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 68 at drivers/opp/core.c:630
> >>> dev_pm_opp_set_rate+0x3cc/0x480
> >>> [ 9.821044] Modules linked in: sha256_generic sha256_arm cfg80211
> >>> joydev mousedev evdev snd_soc_omap_twl4030(+) leds_gpio led_class
> >>> panel_simple pwm_omap_dmtimer gpio_keys pwm_bl cpufreq_dt omap3_isp v
> >>> ideobuf2_dma_contig videobuf2_memops videobuf2_v4l2 videobuf2_common
> >>> bq27xxx_battery_hdq v4l2_fwnode snd_soc_omap_mcbsp bq27xxx_battery
> >>> snd_soc_ti_sdma omap_wdt videodev mc omap_hdq wlcore_sdio wire cn ph
> >>> y_twl4030_usb hwmon omap2430 musb_hdrc omap_mailbox twl4030_wdt
> >>> watchdog udc_core rtc_twl snd_soc_twl4030 ohci_platform(+)
> >>> snd_soc_core snd_pcm_dmaengine ohci_hcd snd_pcm ehci_omap(+)
> >>> twl4030_pwrbutton sn
> >>> d_timer twl4030_charger snd pwm_twl_led pwm_twl ehci_hcd industrialio
> >>> soundcore twl4030_keypad matrix_keymap usbcore at24 tsc2004
> >>> tsc200x_core usb_common omap_ssi hsi omapdss omapdss_base drm
> >>> drm_panel_or
> >>> ientation_quirks cec
> >>> [ 9.894470] CPU: 0 PID: 68 Comm: kworker/0:2 Not tainted
> >>> 5.3.0-rc3-00785-gfdfc7f21c6b7-dirty #5
> >>> [ 9.903198] Hardware name: Generic OMAP36xx (Flattened Device Tree)
> >>> [ 9.909515] Workqueue: events dbs_work_handler
> >>> [ 9.914031] [<c01122d8>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c010c8b8>]
> >>> (show_stack+0x10/0x14)
> >>> [ 9.921813] [<c010c8b8>] (show_stack) from [<c089e858>]
> >>> (dump_stack+0xb4/0xd4)
> >>> [ 9.929107] [<c089e858>] (dump_stack) from [<c0139eb0>]
> >>> (__warn.part.3+0xa8/0xd4)
> >>> [ 9.936614] [<c0139eb0>] (__warn.part.3) from [<c013a034>]
> >>> (warn_slowpath_null+0x40/0x4c)
> >>> [ 9.944854] [<c013a034>] (warn_slowpath_null) from [<c06d666c>]
> >>> (dev_pm_opp_set_rate+0x3cc/0x480)
> >>> [ 9.953796] [<c06d666c>] (dev_pm_opp_set_rate) from [<bf1790ac>]
> >>> (set_target+0x30/0x58 [cpufreq_dt])
> >>> [ 9.963012] [<bf1790ac>] (set_target [cpufreq_dt]) from
> >>> [<c06db05c>] (__cpufreq_driver_target+0x188/0x514)
> >>> [ 9.972717] [<c06db05c>] (__cpufreq_driver_target) from
> >>> [<c06de050>] (od_dbs_update+0x130/0x15c)
> >>> [ 9.981567] [<c06de050>] (od_dbs_update) from [<c06deb08>]
> >>> (dbs_work_handler+0x28/0x58)
> >>> [ 9.989624] [<c06deb08>] (dbs_work_handler) from [<c0154ab0>]
> >>> (process_one_work+0x20c/0x500)
> >>> [ 9.998107] [<c0154ab0>] (process_one_work) from [<c0155e8c>]
> >>> (worker_thread+0x2c/0x5bc)
> >>> [ 10.006256] [<c0155e8c>] (worker_thread) from [<c015ab88>]
> >>> (kthread+0x134/0x148)
> >>> [ 10.013702] [<c015ab88>] (kthread) from [<c01010e8>]
> >>> (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x2c)
> >>> [ 10.020965] Exception stack(0xde63bfb0 to 0xde63bff8)
> >>> [ 10.026062] bfa0: 00000000
> >>> 00000000 00000000 00000000
> >>> [ 10.034271] bfc0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
> >>> 00000000 00000000 00000000
> >>> [ 10.042510] bfe0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000013 00000000
> >>> [ 10.049224] ---[ end trace cf0e15fa4bd57700 ]---
> >>> [ 10.053894] cpu cpu0: multiple regulators are not supported
> >>> [ 10.059509] cpufreq: __target_index: Failed to change cpu frequency: -22
> >>
> >> I have the same:
> >>
> >> [ 4.701354] cpu cpu0: multiple regulators are not supported
> >> [ 4.707794] cpufreq: __target_index: Failed to change cpu frequency: -22
> >>
> >> Comes from within dev_pm_opp_set_rate().
> >>
> >> It appears that we also have to define opp_table->set_opp to make use
> >> of _set_opp_custom(). And I am not sure which custom-opp-setter we should
> >> use. Maybe ti_opp_supply_set_opp() is ok. Or not.
> >
> > This appears to be set by dra7.dtsi through loading the
> > "ti,omap5-opp-supply" compatible driver:
> >
> > https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.3-rc8/source/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7.dtsi#L699
> >
> > Maybe we can use "ti,omap-opp-supply" here, which does not read
> > additional eFuses?
> >
> > See also
> >
> > https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/opp/ti-omap5-opp-supply.txt
> >
> > And, if I understand the code ti_opp_supply_set_opp() correctly, we may not have
> > to rename cpu0-suppy to vdd-supply because that driver takes the first
> > regulator as vdd and the second as vbb.
> >
> > Something like
> >
> > opp_supply_mpu_iva: opp_supply {
> > compatible = "ti,omap-opp-supply";
> > ti,absolute-max-voltage-uv = <1375000>;
> > };
> >
> > But that is a quite wild guess...
>
> Well,
> seems to boot without complaints and do something reasonable!
>
> [ 144.816009] regulator regulator.3: ti_abb_get_voltage_sel
> [ 144.821685] regulator regulator.3: ti_abb_get_voltage_sel idx=2
> [ 144.828521] regulator regulator.3: ti_abb_set_voltage_sel: choose sel 1
> [ 145.133605] regulator regulator.3: ti_abb_get_voltage_sel
> [ 145.139404] regulator regulator.3: ti_abb_get_voltage_sel idx=1
> [ 145.146881] regulator regulator.3: ti_abb_set_voltage_sel: choose sel 0
> [ 145.174163] regulator regulator.3: ti_abb_set_voltage_sel: choose sel 1
> [ 145.449493] regulator regulator.3: ti_abb_set_voltage_sel: choose sel 0
> [ 145.485534] regulator regulator.3: ti_abb_set_voltage_sel: choose sel 2
>
> (I have added printk to ti_abb_get_voltage_sel/ti_abb_set_voltage_sel).
>
> I can also see that there are transitions on the voltages (reg.8 is vdd and reg.3 is abb).

I concur. I have good results with the added ti,omap-opp-supply entry.

>
> root@letux:~# cat /sys/class/regulator/regulator.8/microvolts
> 1012500
> root@letux:~# cat /sys/class/regulator/regulator.8/microvolts
> 1325000
> root@letux:~# cat /sys/class/regulator/regulator.8/microvolts
> 1200000
> root@letux:~#
>
> root@letux:~# cat /sys/class/regulator/regulator.3/microvolts
> 1325000
> root@letux:~# cat /sys/class/regulator/regulator.3/microvolts
> 1200000
> root@letux:~# cat /sys/class/regulator/regulator.3/microvolts
> 1200000
> root@letux:~#
>
> What I haven't checked so far is if it toggles the ABB FBB bit.
>
> I have pushed my current work (the last 4 commits) to
>
> http://git.goldelico.com/?p=letux-kernel.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/work-dm3730-1ghz
>

I noticed the FIXME note on the omap36xx.dtsi file where you added the
vdd-supply reference. For what its worth, I searched for a list of
all files that reference omap3630, then built a bunch of dtb's

make `cat dtb-list` ARCH=arm CROSS_COMPILE="ccache arm-linux-" -j8
DTC arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-beagle-xm.dtb
DTC arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-cm-t3730.dtb
DTC arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-evm-37xx.dtb
DTC arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-igep0020.dtb
DTC arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-igep0020-rev-f.dtb
DTC arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-igep0030.dtb
DTC arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-igep0030-rev-g.dtb
DTC arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-lilly-dbb056.dtb
DTC arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-n950.dtb
DTC arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-n9.dtb
DTC arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-overo-storm-alto35.dtb
DTC arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-overo-storm-chestnut43.dtb
DTC arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-overo-storm-gallop43.dtb
DTC arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-overo-storm-palo35.dtb
DTC arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-overo-storm-palo43.dtb
DTC arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-overo-storm-summit.dtb
DTC arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-overo-storm-tobi.dtb
DTC arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-overo-storm-tobiduo.dtb
DTC arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-pandora-1ghz.dtb
DTC arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-sbc-t3730.dtb
DTC arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-sniper.dtb
DTC arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-zoom3.dtb
DTC arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-gta04a5.dtb
DTC arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-gta04a5one.dtb
DTC arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-gta04a3.dtb
DTC arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-gta04a4.dtb

I think it's probably safe to leave the vcc-supply there, but you may
want to add a note that users who do not use twl4030 should add
something to their device tree to specify the vcc-supply.

At this point, I doubt anyone will do new designs on omap3 SoC's.

> so that you can inspect/compare/test/check before I tidy up and add
> the patches for our OPP-v2 patch set.

I think it looks good. Maybe Tony and or TI people have some
comments, but it appears to set both regulators now.

Nice job!

adam
>
> BR,
> Nikolaus
>

Next message: tiantao6: "[PATCH] PCI: vc: fix warning: no previous prototype"
Previous message: David Hildenbrand: "Re: [PATCH v9 0/8] stg mail -e --version=v9 \"
In reply to: H. Nikolaus Schaller: "Re: [Letux-kernel] [RFC PATCH 0/3] Enable 1GHz support on omap36xx"
Next in thread: H. Nikolaus Schaller: "Re: [Letux-kernel] [RFC PATCH 0/3] Enable 1GHz support on omap36xx"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]