Re: [PATCH] mm/memblock: fix typo in memblock doc

[Mike Rapoport]

On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 11:08:56AM +0800, Cao jin wrote:
> elaboarte -> elaborate
> architecure -> architecture
> compltes -> completes
> 
> Signed-off-by: Cao jin <caoj.fnst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  mm/memblock.c | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c
> index 7d4f61ae666a..0d0f92003d18 100644
> --- a/mm/memblock.c
> +++ b/mm/memblock.c
> @@ -83,16 +83,16 @@
>   * Note, that both API variants use implict assumptions about allowed
>   * memory ranges and the fallback methods. Consult the documentation
>   * of :c:func:`memblock_alloc_internal` and
> - * :c:func:`memblock_alloc_range_nid` functions for more elaboarte
> + * :c:func:`memblock_alloc_range_nid` functions for more elaborate

While on it, could you please replace the
:c:func:`memblock_alloc_range_nid` construct with
memblock_alloc_range_nid()?

And that would be really great to see all the :c:func:`foo` changed to
foo().

>   * description.
>   *
>   * As the system boot progresses, the architecture specific
>   * :c:func:`mem_init` function frees all the memory to the buddy page
>   * allocator.
>   *
> - * Unless an architecure enables %CONFIG_ARCH_KEEP_MEMBLOCK, the
> + * Unless an architecture enables %CONFIG_ARCH_KEEP_MEMBLOCK, the
>   * memblock data structures will be discarded after the system
> - * initialization compltes.
> + * initialization completes.
>   */
>  
>  #ifndef CONFIG_NEED_MULTIPLE_NODES
> -- 
> 2.21.0
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Sincerely yours,
Mike.