Re: [PATCH glibc 2.31 1/5] glibc: Perform rseq(2) registration at C startup and thread creation (v12)

[Florian Weimer]

* Carlos O'Donell:

> It would be easier to merge the patch set if it were just an unconditional
> registration like we do for set_robust_list().

Note that this depends on the in-tree system call numbers list, which I
still need to finish according to Joseph's specifications.

(We have something that should work for us as long as we can get large
machines from the lab, but I agree that it's not very useful if glibc
bot-cycle time is roughly one business day.)

Thanks,
Florian