Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [PATCH v2 3/3] libnvdimm, MAINTAINERS: Maintainer Entry Profile

[Joe Perches]

On Thu, 2019-09-12 at 10:24 +0200, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 9:43 AM Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Now I come to find that CodingStyle has settled on clang-format (in
> > the last 15 months) as the new standard which is a much better answer
> > to me than a manually specified style open to interpretation. I'll
> > take a look at getting libnvdimm converted over.
> 
> Note that clang-format cannot do everything as we want within the
> kernel just yet, but it is a close enough approximation -- it is near
> the point where we could simply agree to use it and stop worrying
> about styling issues. However, that would mean everyone needs to have
> a recent clang-format available, which I think is the biggest obstacle
> at the moment.

I don't think that's close to true yet for clang-format.

For instance: clang-format does not do anything with
missing braces, or coalescing multi-part strings,
or any number of other nominal coding style defects
like all the for_each macros, aligning or not aligning
columnar contents appropriately, etc...

clang-format as yet has no taste.

I believe it'll take a lot of work to improve it to a point
where its formatting is acceptable and appropriate.

An AI rather than a table based system like clang-format is
more likely to be a real solution, but training that AI
isn't a thing that I want to do.