[PATCH 4.19 071/190] scsi: megaraid_sas: Use 63-bit DMA addressing

From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Date: Fri Sep 13 2019 - 09:15:22 EST


[ Upstream commit 894169db12463cea08d0e2a9e35f42b291340e5a ]

Although MegaRAID controllers support 64-bit DMA addressing, as per
hardware design, DMA address with all 64-bits set
(0xFFFFFFFF-FFFFFFFF) results in a firmware fault.

Driver will set 63-bit DMA mask to ensure the above address will not be
used.

Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Shivasharan S <shivasharan.srikanteshwara@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_base.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_base.c b/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_base.c
index 749f10146f630..bc37666f998e6 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_base.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_base.c
@@ -6056,13 +6056,13 @@ static int megasas_io_attach(struct megasas_instance *instance)
* @instance: Adapter soft state
* Description:
*
- * For Ventura, driver/FW will operate in 64bit DMA addresses.
+ * For Ventura, driver/FW will operate in 63bit DMA addresses.
*
* For invader-
* By default, driver/FW will operate in 32bit DMA addresses
* for consistent DMA mapping but if 32 bit consistent
- * DMA mask fails, driver will try with 64 bit consistent
- * mask provided FW is true 64bit DMA capable
+ * DMA mask fails, driver will try with 63 bit consistent
+ * mask provided FW is true 63bit DMA capable
*
* For older controllers(Thunderbolt and MFI based adapters)-
* driver/FW will operate in 32 bit consistent DMA addresses.
@@ -6075,15 +6075,15 @@ megasas_set_dma_mask(struct megasas_instance *instance)
u32 scratch_pad_2;

pdev = instance->pdev;
- consistent_mask = (instance->adapter_type == VENTURA_SERIES) ?
- DMA_BIT_MASK(64) : DMA_BIT_MASK(32);
+ consistent_mask = (instance->adapter_type >= VENTURA_SERIES) ?
+ DMA_BIT_MASK(63) : DMA_BIT_MASK(32);

if (IS_DMA64) {
- if (dma_set_mask(&pdev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(64)) &&
+ if (dma_set_mask(&pdev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(63)) &&
dma_set_mask_and_coherent(&pdev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32)))
goto fail_set_dma_mask;

- if ((*pdev->dev.dma_mask == DMA_BIT_MASK(64)) &&
+ if ((*pdev->dev.dma_mask == DMA_BIT_MASK(63)) &&
(dma_set_coherent_mask(&pdev->dev, consistent_mask) &&
dma_set_mask_and_coherent(&pdev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32)))) {
/*
@@ -6096,7 +6096,7 @@ megasas_set_dma_mask(struct megasas_instance *instance)
if (!(scratch_pad_2 & MR_CAN_HANDLE_64_BIT_DMA_OFFSET))
goto fail_set_dma_mask;
else if (dma_set_mask_and_coherent(&pdev->dev,
- DMA_BIT_MASK(64)))
+ DMA_BIT_MASK(63)))
goto fail_set_dma_mask;
}
} else if (dma_set_mask_and_coherent(&pdev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32)))
@@ -6108,8 +6108,8 @@ megasas_set_dma_mask(struct megasas_instance *instance)
instance->consistent_mask_64bit = true;

dev_info(&pdev->dev, "%s bit DMA mask and %s bit consistent mask\n",
- ((*pdev->dev.dma_mask == DMA_BIT_MASK(64)) ? "64" : "32"),
- (instance->consistent_mask_64bit ? "64" : "32"));
+ ((*pdev->dev.dma_mask == DMA_BIT_MASK(64)) ? "63" : "32"),
+ (instance->consistent_mask_64bit ? "63" : "32"));

return 0;

--
2.20.1