Re: [PATCH 1/4] MMC: Ingenic: Adjust the macro definition name.

[Zhou Yanjie]

Hi Ezequiel,

On 2019å09æ13æ 23:32, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> Hi Zhou,
>
> Thanks for your interest in this driver, I'm glad
> so see it's more used.
>
> On Thu, 2019-09-05 at 15:38 +0800, Zhou Yanjie wrote:
> > Adjust the macro definition name to match the corresponding
> > register name in the datasheet.
> It's not really an issue to have slighlt different
> names on the macros. They are currently sufficiently
> descriptive, and I don't think it's deserves a patch.
Thanks for your advice, I'll drop this in v2. Do you have any suggestions
for the other three patches?

Best regards!
> Thanks,
> Ezequiel
>
> > Signed-off-by: Zhou Yanjie <zhouyanjie@xxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >   drivers/mmc/host/jz4740_mmc.c | 18 +++++++++---------
> >   1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/jz4740_mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/jz4740_mmc.c
> > index ffdbfaa..1b1fcb7 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mmc/host/jz4740_mmc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/jz4740_mmc.c
> > @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@
> >   #include <asm/mach-jz4740/dma.h>
> >   
> >   #define JZ_REG_MMC_STRPCL	0x00
> > -#define JZ_REG_MMC_STATUS	0x04
> > +#define JZ_REG_MMC_STAT		0x04
> >   #define JZ_REG_MMC_CLKRT	0x08
> >   #define JZ_REG_MMC_CMDAT	0x0C
> >   #define JZ_REG_MMC_RESTO	0x10
> > @@ -40,7 +40,7 @@
> >   #define JZ_REG_MMC_IREG		0x28
> >   #define JZ_REG_MMC_CMD		0x2C
> >   #define JZ_REG_MMC_ARG		0x30
> > -#define JZ_REG_MMC_RESP_FIFO	0x34
> > +#define JZ_REG_MMC_RES		0x34
> >   #define JZ_REG_MMC_RXFIFO	0x38
> >   #define JZ_REG_MMC_TXFIFO	0x3C
> >   #define JZ_REG_MMC_DMAC		0x44
> > @@ -391,7 +391,7 @@ static void jz4740_mmc_clock_disable(struct jz4740_mmc_host *host)
> >   
> >   	writew(JZ_MMC_STRPCL_CLOCK_STOP, host->base + JZ_REG_MMC_STRPCL);
> >   	do {
> > -		status = readl(host->base + JZ_REG_MMC_STATUS);
> > +		status = readl(host->base + JZ_REG_MMC_STAT);
> >   	} while (status & JZ_MMC_STATUS_CLK_EN && --timeout);
> >   }
> >   
> > @@ -403,7 +403,7 @@ static void jz4740_mmc_reset(struct jz4740_mmc_host *host)
> >   	writew(JZ_MMC_STRPCL_RESET, host->base + JZ_REG_MMC_STRPCL);
> >   	udelay(10);
> >   	do {
> > -		status = readl(host->base + JZ_REG_MMC_STATUS);
> > +		status = readl(host->base + JZ_REG_MMC_STAT);
> >   	} while (status & JZ_MMC_STATUS_IS_RESETTING && --timeout);
> >   }
> >   
> > @@ -446,7 +446,7 @@ static void jz4740_mmc_transfer_check_state(struct jz4740_mmc_host *host,
> >   {
> >   	int status;
> >   
> > -	status = readl(host->base + JZ_REG_MMC_STATUS);
> > +	status = readl(host->base + JZ_REG_MMC_STAT);
> >   	if (status & JZ_MMC_STATUS_WRITE_ERROR_MASK) {
> >   		if (status & (JZ_MMC_STATUS_TIMEOUT_WRITE)) {
> >   			host->req->cmd->error = -ETIMEDOUT;
> > @@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ static bool jz4740_mmc_read_data(struct jz4740_mmc_host *host,
> >   	/* For whatever reason there is sometime one word more in the fifo then
> >   	 * requested */
> >   	timeout = 1000;
> > -	status = readl(host->base + JZ_REG_MMC_STATUS);
> > +	status = readl(host->base + JZ_REG_MMC_STAT);
> >   	while (!(status & JZ_MMC_STATUS_DATA_FIFO_EMPTY) && --timeout) {
> >   		d = readl(fifo_addr);
> > -		status = readl(host->base + JZ_REG_MMC_STATUS);
> > +		status = readl(host->base + JZ_REG_MMC_STAT);
> >   	}
> >   
> >   	return false;
> > @@ -614,7 +614,7 @@ static void jz4740_mmc_read_response(struct jz4740_mmc_host *host,
> >   {
> >   	int i;
> >   	uint16_t tmp;
> > -	void __iomem *fifo_addr = host->base + JZ_REG_MMC_RESP_FIFO;
> > +	void __iomem *fifo_addr = host->base + JZ_REG_MMC_RES;
> >   
> >   	if (cmd->flags & MMC_RSP_136) {
> >   		tmp = readw(fifo_addr);
> > @@ -797,7 +797,7 @@ static irqreturn_t jz_mmc_irq(int irq, void *devid)
> >   	struct mmc_command *cmd = host->cmd;
> >   	uint32_t irq_reg, status, tmp;
> >   
> > -	status = readl(host->base + JZ_REG_MMC_STATUS);
> > +	status = readl(host->base + JZ_REG_MMC_STAT);
> >   	irq_reg = jz4740_mmc_read_irq_reg(host);
> >   
> >   	tmp = irq_reg;