RE: [PATCH v3 09/11] PCI: layerscape: Add EP mode support for ls1088a and ls2088a

From: Xiaowei Bao
Date: Sat Sep 14 2019 - 00:10:47 EST

Next message: Xiaowei Bao: "RE: [PATCH v3 11/11] misc: pci_endpoint_test: Add LS1088a in pci_device_id table"
Previous message: Dan Carpenter: "drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c:3934 skl_plane_stride() error: testing array offset 'color_plane' after use."
In reply to: Andrew Murray: "Re: [PATCH v3 09/11] PCI: layerscape: Add EP mode support for ls1088a and ls2088a"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Murray <andrew.murray@xxxxxxx>
> Sent: 2019å9æ12æ 20:50
> To: Xiaowei Bao <xiaowei.bao@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; mark.rutland@xxxxxxx; shawnguo@xxxxxxxxxx; Leo
> Li <leoyang.li@xxxxxxx>; kishon@xxxxxx; lorenzo.pieralisi@xxxxxxx; M.h.
> Lian <minghuan.lian@xxxxxxx>; Mingkai Hu <mingkai.hu@xxxxxxx>; Roy
> Zang <roy.zang@xxxxxxx>; jingoohan1@xxxxxxxxx;
> gustavo.pimentel@xxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-pci@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linuxppc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> arnd@xxxxxxxx; gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Z.q. Hou
> <zhiqiang.hou@xxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 09/11] PCI: layerscape: Add EP mode support for
> ls1088a and ls2088a
>
> On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 01:47:36AM +0000, Xiaowei Bao wrote:
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Andrew Murray <andrew.murray@xxxxxxx>
> > > Sent: 2019å9æ2æ 20:46
> > > To: Xiaowei Bao <xiaowei.bao@xxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; mark.rutland@xxxxxxx; shawnguo@xxxxxxxxxx;
> > > Leo Li <leoyang.li@xxxxxxx>; kishon@xxxxxx; lorenzo.pieralisi@xxxxxxx;
> M.h.
> > > Lian <minghuan.lian@xxxxxxx>; Mingkai Hu <mingkai.hu@xxxxxxx>; Roy
> > > Zang <roy.zang@xxxxxxx>; jingoohan1@xxxxxxxxx;
> > > gustavo.pimentel@xxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-pci@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> > > devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> > > linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linuxppc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> > > arnd@xxxxxxxx; gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Z.q. Hou
> > > <zhiqiang.hou@xxxxxxx>
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 09/11] PCI: layerscape: Add EP mode support
> > > for ls1088a and ls2088a
> > >
> > > On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 11:17:14AM +0800, Xiaowei Bao wrote:
> > > > Add PCIe EP mode support for ls1088a and ls2088a, there are some
> > > > difference between LS1 and LS2 platform, so refactor the code of
> > > > the EP driver.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Xiaowei Bao <xiaowei.bao@xxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > > v2:
> > > > - This is a new patch for supporting the ls1088a and ls2088a platform.
> > > > v3:
> > > > - Adjust the some struct assignment order in probe function.
> > > >
> > > > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c | 72
> > > > +++++++++++++++++++-------
> > > > 1 file changed, 53 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c
> > > > b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c
> > > > index 5f0cb99..723bbe5 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c
> > > > @@ -20,27 +20,29 @@
> > > >
> > > > #define PCIE_DBI2_OFFSET 0x1000 /* DBI2 base address*/
> > > >
> > > > -struct ls_pcie_ep {
> > > > - struct dw_pcie *pci;
> > > > - struct pci_epc_features *ls_epc;
> > > > +#define to_ls_pcie_ep(x) dev_get_drvdata((x)->dev)
> > > > +
> > > > +struct ls_pcie_ep_drvdata {
> > > > + u32 func_offset;
> > > > + const struct dw_pcie_ep_ops *ops;
> > > > + const struct dw_pcie_ops *dw_pcie_ops;
> > > > };
> > > >
> > > > -#define to_ls_pcie_ep(x) dev_get_drvdata((x)->dev)
> > > > +struct ls_pcie_ep {
> > > > + struct dw_pcie *pci;
> > > > + struct pci_epc_features *ls_epc;
> > > > + const struct ls_pcie_ep_drvdata *drvdata; };
> > > >
> > > > static int ls_pcie_establish_link(struct dw_pcie *pci) {
> > > > return 0;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > -static const struct dw_pcie_ops ls_pcie_ep_ops = {
> > > > +static const struct dw_pcie_ops dw_ls_pcie_ep_ops = {
> > > > .start_link = ls_pcie_establish_link, };
> > > >
> > > > -static const struct of_device_id ls_pcie_ep_of_match[] = {
> > > > - { .compatible = "fsl,ls-pcie-ep",},
> > > > - { },
> > > > -};
> > > > -
> > > > static const struct pci_epc_features*
> > > > ls_pcie_ep_get_features(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep) { @@ -87,10 +89,39
> > > > @@ static int ls_pcie_ep_raise_irq(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep, u8 func_no,
> > > > }
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > -static const struct dw_pcie_ep_ops pcie_ep_ops = {
> > > > +static unsigned int ls_pcie_ep_func_conf_select(struct dw_pcie_ep
> *ep,
> > > > + u8 func_no)
> > > > +{
> > > > + struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_ep(ep);
> > > > + struct ls_pcie_ep *pcie = to_ls_pcie_ep(pci);
> > > > +
> > > > + WARN_ON(func_no && !pcie->drvdata->func_offset);
> > > > + return pcie->drvdata->func_offset * func_no; }
> > > > +
> > > > +static const struct dw_pcie_ep_ops ls_pcie_ep_ops = {
> > > > .ep_init = ls_pcie_ep_init,
> > > > .raise_irq = ls_pcie_ep_raise_irq,
> > > > .get_features = ls_pcie_ep_get_features,
> > > > + .func_conf_select = ls_pcie_ep_func_conf_select, };
> > > > +
> > > > +static const struct ls_pcie_ep_drvdata ls1_ep_drvdata = {
> > > > + .ops = &ls_pcie_ep_ops,
> > > > + .dw_pcie_ops = &dw_ls_pcie_ep_ops, };
> > > > +
> > > > +static const struct ls_pcie_ep_drvdata ls2_ep_drvdata = {
> > > > + .func_offset = 0x20000,
> > > > + .ops = &ls_pcie_ep_ops,
> > > > + .dw_pcie_ops = &dw_ls_pcie_ep_ops, };
> > > > +
> > > > +static const struct of_device_id ls_pcie_ep_of_match[] = {
> > > > + { .compatible = "fsl,ls1046a-pcie-ep", .data = &ls1_ep_drvdata },
> > > > + { .compatible = "fsl,ls1088a-pcie-ep", .data = &ls2_ep_drvdata },
> > > > + { .compatible = "fsl,ls2088a-pcie-ep", .data = &ls2_ep_drvdata },
> > > > + { },
> > >
> > > This removes support for "fsl,ls-pcie-ep" - was that intentional? If
> > > you do plan to drop it please make sure you explain why in the
> > > commit message. See also my comments in your dt-binding patch.
> >
> > In fact, the u-boot will fixup the status property to 'status =
> > enabled' in PCI node of the DTS base on "fsl,ls-pcie-ep" compatible,
> > so "fsl,ls-pcie-ep" is used, I used this compatible before, because
> > the driver only support the LS1046a, but this time, I add the LS1088a
> > and LS2088a support, and these two boards have some difference form
> LS1046a, so I changed the compatible. I am not sure whether need to add
> "fsl,ls-pcie-ep"
> > in there, could you give some advice, thanks a lot.
>
> It sounds like "fsl,ls-pcie-ep" can be a fallback for "fsl,ls1046a-pcie-ep".

This is not a fallback, the compatible "fsl,ls1046a-pcie-ep" is used by bootloader,
the bootloader will modify the status property, the bootloader code get the
PCI_HEADER_TYPE(0xe) of config space to decide enable which node(EP or RC)
status property. At the beginning, we plan to use one compatible "fsl,ls1046a-pcie-ep"
support all NXP's platform, but actually, due to the difference of each platform,
it is difficult.

>
> I'm assuming that if someone used "fsl,ls1046a-pcie-ep" on ls1088a or
> ls2088a hardware it would still work, but without the multiple PF support.
>

I think the EP driver will not work if use current code, due to the current driver
need driver data.

> I.e. if "fsl,ls-pcie-ep" is given, treat it as ls1046a.

>
> Thanks,
>
> Andrew Murray
>
> >
> > Thanks
> > Xiaowei
> >
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Andrew Murray
> > >
> > > > };
> > > >
> > > > static int __init ls_add_pcie_ep(struct ls_pcie_ep *pcie, @@
> > > > -103,7
> > > > +134,7 @@ static int __init ls_add_pcie_ep(struct ls_pcie_ep
> > > > +*pcie,
> > > > int ret;
> > > >
> > > > ep = &pci->ep;
> > > > - ep->ops = &pcie_ep_ops;
> > > > + ep->ops = pcie->drvdata->ops;
> > > >
> > > > res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM,
> > > "addr_space");
> > > > if (!res)
> > > > @@ -142,20 +173,23 @@ static int __init ls_pcie_ep_probe(struct
> > > platform_device *pdev)
> > > > if (!ls_epc)
> > > > return -ENOMEM;
> > > >
> > > > - dbi_base = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev,
> IORESOURCE_MEM,
> > > "regs");
> > > > - pci->dbi_base = devm_pci_remap_cfg_resource(dev, dbi_base);
> > > > - if (IS_ERR(pci->dbi_base))
> > > > - return PTR_ERR(pci->dbi_base);
> > > > + pcie->drvdata = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
> > > >
> > > > - pci->dbi_base2 = pci->dbi_base + PCIE_DBI2_OFFSET;
> > > > pci->dev = dev;
> > > > - pci->ops = &ls_pcie_ep_ops;
> > > > - pcie->pci = pci;
> > > > + pci->ops = pcie->drvdata->dw_pcie_ops;
> > > >
> > > > ls_epc->bar_fixed_64bit = (1 << BAR_2) | (1 << BAR_4),
> > > >
> > > > + pcie->pci = pci;
> > > > pcie->ls_epc = ls_epc;
> > > >
> > > > + dbi_base = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev,
> IORESOURCE_MEM,
> > > "regs");
> > > > + pci->dbi_base = devm_pci_remap_cfg_resource(dev, dbi_base);
> > > > + if (IS_ERR(pci->dbi_base))
> > > > + return PTR_ERR(pci->dbi_base);
> > > > +
> > > > + pci->dbi_base2 = pci->dbi_base + PCIE_DBI2_OFFSET;
> > > > +
> > > > platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pcie);
> > > >
> > > > ret = ls_add_pcie_ep(pcie, pdev);
> > > > --
> > > > 2.9.5
> > > >

Next message: Xiaowei Bao: "RE: [PATCH v3 11/11] misc: pci_endpoint_test: Add LS1088a in pci_device_id table"
Previous message: Dan Carpenter: "drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c:3934 skl_plane_stride() error: testing array offset 'color_plane' after use."
In reply to: Andrew Murray: "Re: [PATCH v3 09/11] PCI: layerscape: Add EP mode support for ls1088a and ls2088a"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]