Re: [PATCH] mm/memblock: cleanup doc

From: Mike Rapoport
Date: Sun Sep 15 2019 - 01:17:23 EST


On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 08:31:27PM +0800, Cao jin wrote:
> fix typos for:
> elaboarte -> elaborate
> architecure -> architecture
> compltes -> completes
>
> And, convert the markup :c:func:`foo` to foo() as kernel documentation
> toolchain can recognize foo() as a function.
>
> Suggested-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Cao jin <caoj.fnst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> ---
> mm/memblock.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c
> index 7d4f61ae666a..c23b370cc49e 100644
> --- a/mm/memblock.c
> +++ b/mm/memblock.c
> @@ -57,42 +57,38 @@
> * at build time. The region arrays for the "memory" and "reserved"
> * types are initially sized to %INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS and for the
> * "physmap" type to %INIT_PHYSMEM_REGIONS.
> - * The :c:func:`memblock_allow_resize` enables automatic resizing of
> - * the region arrays during addition of new regions. This feature
> - * should be used with care so that memory allocated for the region
> - * array will not overlap with areas that should be reserved, for
> - * example initrd.
> + * The memblock_allow_resize() enables automatic resizing of the region
> + * arrays during addition of new regions. This feature should be used
> + * with care so that memory allocated for the region array will not
> + * overlap with areas that should be reserved, for example initrd.
> *
> * The early architecture setup should tell memblock what the physical
> - * memory layout is by using :c:func:`memblock_add` or
> - * :c:func:`memblock_add_node` functions. The first function does not
> - * assign the region to a NUMA node and it is appropriate for UMA
> - * systems. Yet, it is possible to use it on NUMA systems as well and
> - * assign the region to a NUMA node later in the setup process using
> - * :c:func:`memblock_set_node`. The :c:func:`memblock_add_node`
> - * performs such an assignment directly.
> + * memory layout is by using memblock_add() or memblock_add_node()
> + * functions. The first function does not assign the region to a NUMA
> + * node and it is appropriate for UMA systems. Yet, it is possible to
> + * use it on NUMA systems as well and assign the region to a NUMA node
> + * later in the setup process using memblock_set_node(). The
> + * memblock_add_node() performs such an assignment directly.
> *
> * Once memblock is setup the memory can be allocated using one of the
> * API variants:
> *
> - * * :c:func:`memblock_phys_alloc*` - these functions return the
> - * **physical** address of the allocated memory
> - * * :c:func:`memblock_alloc*` - these functions return the **virtual**
> - * address of the allocated memory.
> + * * memblock_phys_alloc*() - these functions return the **physical**
> + * address of the allocated memory
> + * * memblock_alloc*() - these functions return the **virtual** address
> + * of the allocated memory.
> *
> * Note, that both API variants use implict assumptions about allowed
> * memory ranges and the fallback methods. Consult the documentation
> - * of :c:func:`memblock_alloc_internal` and
> - * :c:func:`memblock_alloc_range_nid` functions for more elaboarte
> - * description.
> + * of memblock_alloc_internal() and memblock_alloc_range_nid()
> + * functions for more elaborate description.
> *
> - * As the system boot progresses, the architecture specific
> - * :c:func:`mem_init` function frees all the memory to the buddy page
> - * allocator.
> + * As the system boot progresses, the architecture specific mem_init()
> + * function frees all the memory to the buddy page allocator.
> *
> - * Unless an architecure enables %CONFIG_ARCH_KEEP_MEMBLOCK, the
> + * Unless an architecture enables %CONFIG_ARCH_KEEP_MEMBLOCK, the
> * memblock data structures will be discarded after the system
> - * initialization compltes.
> + * initialization completes.
> */
>
> #ifndef CONFIG_NEED_MULTIPLE_NODES
> --
> 2.21.0
>
>
>

--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.