Re: [HELP REQUESTED from the community] Was: Staging status of speakup
From: Okash Khawaja
Date: Sun Sep 15 2019 - 14:41:46 EST
On Sun, Sep 15, 2019 at 2:43 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Sep 14, 2019 at 10:08:35PM +0100, Okash Khawaja wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 9, 2019 at 3:55 AM Gregory Nowak <greg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sun, Sep 08, 2019 at 10:43:02AM +0100, Okash Khawaja wrote:
> > > > Sorry, I have only now got round to working on this. It's not complete
> > > > yet but I have assimilated the feedback and converted subjective
> > > > phrases, like "I think..." into objective statements or put them in
> > > > TODO: so that someone else may verify. I have attached it to this
> > > > email.
> > >
> > > I think bleeps needs a TODO, since we don't know what values it accepts, or
> > > what difference those values make. Also, to keep things uniform, we
> > > should replace my "don't know" for trigger_time with a TODO. Looks
> > > good to me otherwise. Thanks.
> >
> > Great thanks. I have updated.
> >
> > I have two questions:
> >
> > 1. Is it okay for these descriptions to go inside
> > Documentation/ABI/stable? They have been around since 2.6 (2010). Or
> > would we prefer Documentation/ABI/testing/?
>
> stable is fine.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Thanks Samuel and Greg.
I have attached the descriptions. There are still some files marked
with TODO, whose descriptions are incomplete or missing.
Thanks,
Okash
Attachment:
sysfs-driver-speakup
Description: Binary data