Re: [PATCH 1/2] platform: goldfish: Allow goldfish virtual platform drivers for RISCV
From: Anup Patel
Date: Wed Sep 25 2019 - 01:00:30 EST
On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 10:13 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 04:30:03AM +0000, Anup Patel wrote:
> > We will be using some of the Goldfish virtual platform devices (such
> > as RTC) on QEMU RISC-V virt machine so this patch enables goldfish
> > kconfig option for RISC-V architecture.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <anup.patel@xxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/platform/goldfish/Kconfig | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/platform/goldfish/Kconfig b/drivers/platform/goldfish/Kconfig
> > index 77b35df3a801..0ba825030ffe 100644
> > --- a/drivers/platform/goldfish/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/platform/goldfish/Kconfig
> > @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
> > # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> > menuconfig GOLDFISH
> > bool "Platform support for Goldfish virtual devices"
> > - depends on X86_32 || X86_64 || ARM || ARM64 || MIPS
> > + depends on X86_32 || X86_64 || ARM || ARM64 || MIPS || RISCV
>
> Why does this depend on any of these? Can't we just have:
May be Goldfish drivers were compile tested/tried on these architectures only.
>
> > depends on HAS_IOMEM
>
> And that's it?
I think it should be just "depends on HAS_IOMEM && HAS_DMA" just like
VirtIO MMIO. Agree ??
Regards,
Anup