Re: [PATCH 04/32] riscv: Use pr_warn instead of pr_warning

[Palmer Dabbelt]

On Thu, 19 Sep 2019 23:25:16 PDT (-0700), wangkefeng.wang@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> As said in commit f2c2cbcc35d4 ("powerpc: Use pr_warn instead of
> pr_warning"), removing pr_warning so all logging messages use a
> consistent <prefix>_warn style. Let's do it.
>
> Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Albert Ou <aou@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/riscv/kernel/module.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/module.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/module.c
> index 70bb94ae61c5..b7401858d872 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/module.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/module.c
> @@ -315,8 +315,8 @@ int apply_relocate_add(Elf_Shdr *sechdrs, const char *strtab,
>  			/* Ignore unresolved weak symbol */
>  			if (ELF_ST_BIND(sym->st_info) == STB_WEAK)
>  				continue;
> -			pr_warning("%s: Unknown symbol %s\n",
> -				   me->name, strtab + sym->st_name);
> +			pr_warn("%s: Unknown symbol %s\n",
> +				me->name, strtab + sym->st_name);
>  			return -ENOENT;
>  		}

Acked-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@xxxxxxxxxx>

I'm assuming this is going in through some other tree, LMK if that's not the 
case.