[RFC PATCH] x86/doc/boot_protocol: Correct the description of "reloc"

[Cao jin]

The fields marked with (reloc) actually are not dedicated for writing,
but communicating info for relocatable kernel with boot loaders. For
example:

    ============    ============
    Field name:     pref_address
    Type:           read (reloc)
    Offset/size:    0x258/8
    Protocol:       2.10+
    ============    ============

    ============    ========================
    Field name:     code32_start
    Type:           modify (optional, reloc)
    Offset/size:    0x214/4
    Protocol:       2.00+
    ============    ========================

Signed-off-by: Cao jin <caoj.fnst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
Unless I have incorrect non-native understanding for "fill in", I think
this is inaccurate.

 Documentation/x86/boot.rst | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/x86/boot.rst b/Documentation/x86/boot.rst
index 08a2f100c0e6..a611bf04492d 100644
--- a/Documentation/x86/boot.rst
+++ b/Documentation/x86/boot.rst
@@ -243,7 +243,7 @@ bootloader ("modify").
 
 All general purpose boot loaders should write the fields marked
 (obligatory).  Boot loaders who want to load the kernel at a
-nonstandard address should fill in the fields marked (reloc); other
+nonstandard address should consult with the fields marked (reloc); other
 boot loaders can ignore those fields.
 
 The byte order of all fields is littleendian (this is x86, after all.)
-- 
2.21.0