Re: [PATCH 1/2] leds: Add flag to keep trigger always
From: Pavel Machek
Date: Mon Sep 30 2019 - 16:58:48 EST
On Mon 2019-09-30 15:39:02, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 10, 2019 at 09:13:22AM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > On Fri 2019-08-09 17:52:46, Guru Das Srinagesh wrote:
> > > From: Subbaraman Narayanamurthy <subbaram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > Commit 0013b23d66a2768f5babbb0ea9f03ab067a990d8 ("leds: disable triggers
> > > on brightness set") removes the trigger on an LED class device when
> > > brightness is set to 0. However, there are some LED class devices which
> > > need the trigger not to be removed. In a use case like camera flash,
> > > camera flash driver passes in a trigger device to LED class driver. If
> > > the trigger is removed when the brightness is set to 0, this will affect
> > > the clients using those triggers. Hence add a flag to always keep the
> > > trigger even when brightness is set to 0.
> >
> > No.
> >
> > Yes, it would affect those clients. Don't do it, then. It is
> > root-only operation.
>
> I don't understand. The original commit broke userspace operations.
> Shouldn't it be reverted, or fixed this way in order to have userspace
> work properly again?
So, what it is exactly that is not working? :-). Yes, root can
disconnect LED from v4l2 interface; he can also connect it
back. Documentation says that happens.
Yes, root can do stupid things.
Commit 0013b23d66a2768f5babbb0ea9f03ab067a990d8 is from 2008. I'd
prefer we did not apply it in 2008, but...
Best regards,
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature