Re: [PATCH] ARM: don't export unused return_address()

[Geert Uytterhoeven]

Hi Arnd,

On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 5:47 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Without the frame pointer enabled, return_address() is an inline
> function and does not need to be exported, as shown by this warning:
>
> WARNING: "return_address" [vmlinux] is a static EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL
>
> Move the EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL() into the #ifdef as well.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>

Thanks for your patch!

Tested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx>

> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/return_address.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/return_address.c
> @@ -53,6 +53,7 @@ void *return_address(unsigned int level)
>                 return NULL;
>  }
>

Checkpatch doesn't like the empty line above:

WARNING: EXPORT_SYMBOL(foo); should immediately follow its function/variable

> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(return_address);
> +
>  #endif /* if defined(CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER) && !defined(CONFIG_ARM_UNWIND) */
>
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(return_address);

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds