Re: [PATCH v3] string-choice: add yesno(), onoff(), enableddisabled(), plural() helpers

[Rasmus Villemoes]

On 02/10/2019 12.11, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Tue, 01 Oct 2019, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> While the main goal here is to abstract recurring patterns, and slightly
>> clean up the code base by not open coding the ternary operators, there
>> are also some space savings to be had via better string constant
>> pooling.
> 
> Make that
> 
> """
> While the main goal here is to abstract recurring patterns, and slightly
> clean up the code base by not open coding the ternary operators, using
> functions to access the strings also makes it easier to seek different
> implementation options for potential space savings on string constants
> in the future.
> """
> 
> to be more explicit that this change does not directly translate to any
> space savings.
> 
> Rasmus, okay with that?

It's rather fluffy, but it doesn't make unfounded claims about space
savings, so in that regard I'm fine with it.

[It's probably just my lack of imagination, but I still fail to see how
one could ever achieve better than the linker creating just 1
vmlinux-wide instance of "enabled", which I believe happens regardless
of whether one uses these helpers or not.]

Rasmus