Re: [PATCH] power: supply: max17042_battery: fix some usage of uninitialized variables

[kbuild test robot]

Hi Yizhuo,

Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve:

[auto build test WARNING on power-supply/for-next]
[cannot apply to v5.4-rc1 next-20191002]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system. BTW, we also suggest to use '--base' option to specify the
base tree in git format-patch, please see https://stackoverflow.com/a/37406982]

url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Yizhuo/power-supply-max17042_battery-fix-some-usage-of-uninitialized-variables/20191003-040948
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sre/linux-power-supply.git for-next
config: sh-allmodconfig (attached as .config)
compiler: sh4-linux-gcc (GCC) 7.4.0
reproduce:
        wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
        chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
        # save the attached .config to linux build tree
        GCC_VERSION=7.4.0 make.cross ARCH=sh 

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>

All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):

   drivers/power/supply/max17042_battery.c: In function 'max17042_load_new_capacity_params':
>> drivers/power/supply/max17042_battery.c:697:10: warning: 'return' with a value, in function returning void
      return ret;
             ^~~
   drivers/power/supply/max17042_battery.c:686:13: note: declared here
    static void max17042_load_new_capacity_params(struct max17042_chip *chip)
                ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   drivers/power/supply/max17042_battery.c:701:10: warning: 'return' with a value, in function returning void
      return ret;
             ^~~
   drivers/power/supply/max17042_battery.c:686:13: note: declared here
    static void max17042_load_new_capacity_params(struct max17042_chip *chip)
                ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

vim +/return +697 drivers/power/supply/max17042_battery.c

   685	
   686	static void max17042_load_new_capacity_params(struct max17042_chip *chip)
   687	{
   688		u32 full_cap0, rep_cap, dq_acc, vfSoc;
   689		u32 rem_cap;
   690		int ret;
   691	
   692		struct max17042_config_data *config = chip->pdata->config_data;
   693		struct regmap *map = chip->regmap;
   694	
   695		ret = regmap_read(map, MAX17042_FullCAP0, &full_cap0);
   696		if (ret)
 > 697			return ret;
   698	
   699		ret = regmap_read(map, MAX17042_VFSOC, &vfSoc);
   700		if (ret)
   701			return ret;
   702	
   703		/* fg_vfSoc needs to shifted by 8 bits to get the
   704		 * perc in 1% accuracy, to get the right rem_cap multiply
   705		 * full_cap0, fg_vfSoc and devide by 100
   706		 */
   707		rem_cap = ((vfSoc >> 8) * full_cap0) / 100;
   708		max17042_write_verify_reg(map, MAX17042_RemCap, rem_cap);
   709	
   710		rep_cap = rem_cap;
   711		max17042_write_verify_reg(map, MAX17042_RepCap, rep_cap);
   712	
   713		/* Write dQ_acc to 200% of Capacity and dP_acc to 200% */
   714		dq_acc = config->fullcap / dQ_ACC_DIV;
   715		max17042_write_verify_reg(map, MAX17042_dQacc, dq_acc);
   716		max17042_write_verify_reg(map, MAX17042_dPacc, dP_ACC_200);
   717	
   718		max17042_write_verify_reg(map, MAX17042_FullCAP,
   719				config->fullcap);
   720		regmap_write(map, MAX17042_DesignCap,
   721				config->design_cap);
   722		max17042_write_verify_reg(map, MAX17042_FullCAPNom,
   723				config->fullcapnom);
   724		/* Update SOC register with new SOC */
   725		regmap_write(map, MAX17042_RepSOC, vfSoc);
   726	}
   727	

---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure                Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all                   Intel Corporation

Attachment: .config.gz
Description: application/gzip