Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] pwm: update comment on struct pwm_ops::apply

[Uwe Kleine-König]

On Fri, Oct 04, 2019 at 03:32:07PM +0200, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> Commit 71523d1812ac (pwm: Ensure pwm_apply_state() doesn't modify the
> state argument) updated the kernel-doc for pwm_apply_state(), but not
> for the ->apply callback in the pwm_ops struct.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  include/linux/pwm.h | 5 +----
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/pwm.h b/include/linux/pwm.h
> index b2c9c460947d..0ef808d925bb 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pwm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pwm.h
> @@ -243,10 +243,7 @@ pwm_set_relative_duty_cycle(struct pwm_state *state, unsigned int duty_cycle,
>   * @request: optional hook for requesting a PWM
>   * @free: optional hook for freeing a PWM
>   * @capture: capture and report PWM signal
> - * @apply: atomically apply a new PWM config. The state argument
> - *	   should be adjusted with the real hardware config (if the
> - *	   approximate the period or duty_cycle value, state should
> - *	   reflect it)
> + * @apply: atomically apply a new PWM config

Reviewed-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |