Re: [PATCH 05/11] IB/hfi1: convert __mmu_int_rb to half closed intervals

[Davidlohr Bueso]

On Fri, 04 Oct 2019, Michel Lespinasse wrote:

> On Thu, Oct 03, 2019 at 01:18:52PM -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/mmu_rb.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/mmu_rb.c
> > index 14d2a90964c3..fb6382b2d44e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/mmu_rb.c
> > +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/mmu_rb.c
> > @@ -47,7 +47,7 @@
> >  #include <linux/list.h>
> >  #include <linux/rculist.h>
> >  #include <linux/mmu_notifier.h>
> > -#include <linux/interval_tree_generic.h>
> > +#include <linux/interval_tree_gen.h>
> >
> >  #include "mmu_rb.h"
> >  #include "trace.h"
> > @@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ static unsigned long mmu_node_start(struct mmu_rb_node *node)
> >
> >  static unsigned long mmu_node_last(struct mmu_rb_node *node)
> >  {
> > -	return PAGE_ALIGN(node->addr + node->len) - 1;
> > +	return PAGE_ALIGN(node->addr + node->len);
> >  }
>
> May as well rename the function mmu_node_end(). I was worried if it
> was used anywhere else, but it turned out it's only used when defining
> the interval tree.

Right.

In general I tried not to rename everything to end because I wanted to
avoid bloating the diffstat, albeit having naming discrepancies within
the code (which isn't new either fwiw).

> I would also suggest moving this function (as well as mmu_node_first)
> right before its use, rather than just after, which would allow you to
> also remove the function prototype a few lines earlier.

Indeed, but again I don't want to unnecessarily grow the patch. I have
several notes to come back to once/if this series is settled.

> Looks good to me otherwise.
>
> Reviewed-by: Michel Lespinasse <walken@xxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks,
Davidlohr