[PATCH v2 3/4] module: Properly propagate MODULE_STATE_COMING failure

[Peter Zijlstra]

Now that notifiers got unbroken; use the proper interface to handle
notifier errors and propagate them.

There were already MODULE_STATE_COMING notifiers that failed; notably:

 - jump_label_module_notifier()
 - tracepoint_module_notify()
 - bpf_event_notify()

By propagating this error, we fix those users.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Yonghong Song <yhs@xxxxxx>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Song Liu <songliubraving@xxxxxx>
Cc: Jessica Yu <jeyu@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@xxxxxx>
---
 kernel/module.c |   10 +++++++---
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/kernel/module.c
+++ b/kernel/module.c
@@ -3751,9 +3751,13 @@ static int prepare_coming_module(struct
 	if (err)
 		return err;
 
-	blocking_notifier_call_chain(&module_notify_list,
-				     MODULE_STATE_COMING, mod);
-	return 0;
+	err = blocking_notifier_call_chain_robust(&module_notify_list,
+			MODULE_STATE_COMING, MODULE_STATE_GOING, mod);
+	err = notifier_to_errno(err);
+	if (err)
+		klp_module_going(mod);
+
+	return err;
 }
 
 static int unknown_module_param_cb(char *param, char *val, const char *modname,