Re: [PATCH 2/5] backlight: pwm_bl: eliminate a 64/32 division

[Daniel Thompson]

On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 04:06:17PM +0200, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> lightness*1000 is nowhere near overflowing 32 bits, so we can just use
> an ordinary 32/32 division, which is much cheaper than the 64/32 done
> via do_div().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@xxxxxxxxxx>

> ---
>  drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c b/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c
> index be36be1cacb7..9252d51f31b9 100644
> --- a/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c
> +++ b/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c
> @@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ static u64 cie1931(unsigned int lightness, unsigned int scale)
>  	 */
>  	lightness *= 100;
>  	if (lightness <= (8 * scale)) {
> -		retval = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL(lightness * 10, 9033);
> +		retval = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(lightness * 10, 9033);
>  	} else {
>  		retval = int_pow((lightness + (16 * scale)) / 116, 3);
>  		retval = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL(retval, (scale * scale));
> -- 
> 2.20.1