Re: [PATCH v3 04/10] sched/fair: rework load_balance

From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Tue Oct 08 2019 - 10:17:02 EST

Next message: Tony Lindgren: "Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: am3874-iceboard: Fix 'i2c-mux-idle-disconnect' usage"
Previous message: Pablo Neira Ayuso: "Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 8/9] net/netfilter: Replace rcu_swap_protected() with rcu_replace()"
In reply to: Peter Zijlstra: "Re: [PATCH v3 04/10] sched/fair: rework load_balance"
Next in thread: Valentin Schneider: "Re: [PATCH v3 04/10] sched/fair: rework load_balance"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 11:47:59AM +0100, Valentin Schneider wrote:

> Yeah, right shift on signed negative values are implementation defined.

Seriously? Even under -fno-strict-overflow? There is a perfectly
sensible operation for signed shift right, this stuff should not be
undefined.

Next message: Tony Lindgren: "Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: am3874-iceboard: Fix 'i2c-mux-idle-disconnect' usage"
Previous message: Pablo Neira Ayuso: "Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 8/9] net/netfilter: Replace rcu_swap_protected() with rcu_replace()"
In reply to: Peter Zijlstra: "Re: [PATCH v3 04/10] sched/fair: rework load_balance"
Next in thread: Valentin Schneider: "Re: [PATCH v3 04/10] sched/fair: rework load_balance"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]