RE: [PATCH] tty: serial: imx: Only get second/third IRQ when there is more than one IRQ

[Anson Huang]

Hi, Uwe

> On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 02:18:31PM +0800, Anson Huang wrote:
> > All i.MX SoCs except i.MX1 have ONLY 1 IRQ, so it is better to check
> > the IRQ count before getting second/third IRQ to avoid below error
> > message during probe:
> >
> > [    0.726219] imx-uart 30860000.serial: IRQ index 1 not found
> > [    0.731329] imx-uart 30860000.serial: IRQ index 2 not found
> 
> This message was introduced in commit
> 7723f4c5ecdb8d832f049f8483beb0d1081cedf6 for 5.4-rc1. I added the
> involved people to the recipents of this mail.

Yes, I noticed this, thanks.

> 
> > Signed-off-by: Anson Huang <Anson.Huang@xxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  drivers/tty/serial/imx.c | 13 +++++++++++--
> >  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/imx.c b/drivers/tty/serial/imx.c index
> > 504d81c..081fa82 100644
> > --- a/drivers/tty/serial/imx.c
> > +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/imx.c
> > @@ -2198,6 +2198,7 @@ static int imx_uart_probe(struct platform_device
> *pdev)
> >  	u32 ucr1;
> >  	struct resource *res;
> >  	int txirq, rxirq, rtsirq;
> > +	int irq_count;
> >
> >  	sport = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*sport), GFP_KERNEL);
> >  	if (!sport)
> > @@ -2220,9 +2221,17 @@ static int imx_uart_probe(struct
> platform_device *pdev)
> >  	if (IS_ERR(base))
> >  		return PTR_ERR(base);
> >
> > +	irq_count = platform_irq_count(pdev);
> > +	if (irq_count < 0)
> > +		return irq_count;
> > +
> >  	rxirq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> > -	txirq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 1);
> > -	rtsirq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 2);
> > +	if (irq_count > 1) {
> > +		txirq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 1);
> > +		rtsirq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 2);
> > +	} else {
> > +		txirq = rtsirq = -ENXIO;
> > +	}
> 
> The patch is fine given the changed behaviour of platform_get_irq. I wonder
> if it is sensible to introduce a variant of platform_get_irq (say
> platform_get_irq_nowarn) that behaves like __platform_get_irq does t
> Then the imx driver would just call platform_get_irq_nowarn without having
> to check the number of available irqs first.

Agreed, it would be nice if we can fix this from the API level, this is to save many patches
from various drivers side, let me know if agreement is reached and I will do the patch.

Thanks,
Anson.