* Jeroen Hofstee <jhofstee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [191008 17:00]:
Hi,
On 10/8/19 6:51 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Jeroen Hofstee <jhofstee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [191008 16:43]:
Hello Tony,Hmm so what's the issue with just adding the fixes tag Grygorii
On 10/8/19 6:14 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Jeroen Hofstee <jhofstee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [191008 16:03]:But 4.19 is fine, this is an issue in 5.1 as in EOL...
Hello Tony,Well please add the fixes tag, that way this will get
On 10/8/19 4:23 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@xxxxxx> [191003 02:32]:For completeness, there is no "Fixes tag" as you mentioned.
On 03/10/2019 11:16, Jeroen Hofstee wrote:Jeroen, can you please send an updated patch with the fixes
Furthermore 4.19 is fine, so there is no need to include it in stableHence all above patches went in 5.1 it would be correct to mention only
and have a note to make sure also other patches are required etc.
6d4cd041f0af net: phy: at803x: disable delay only for RGMII mode
tag changed?
The commit only refers to another commit which introduces
a problem.
properly applied to earlier stable kernels too :)
I really don't understand why I should waste time
to figure out what happened exactly during the 5.1
release cycle...
suggested:
6d4cd041f0af ("net: phy: at803x: disable delay only for RGMII mode")
No need to dig further?
Grygorii doesn't suggest to add a fixes tag, just to change the referenced
commit to another. Obviously I would like to understand why another commit
should be referenced. And then I should read and parse the response, so there
is no special reason, just time...
OK sure. Well once you guys have the commit figured out, let me
know what to apply. And we know Grygorii is mostly right based
on his history of comments so best to not ignore that :)