Re: [PATCH] cpufreq/cpufreq_governor: Fix memory leak in cpufreq_dbs_governor_init

[Viresh Kumar]

On 09-10-19, 18:26, Navid Emamdoost wrote:
> In the implementation of cpufreq_dbs_governor_init(), dbs_data is
> allocated and later is assigned to governor_data. But before that
> assignment, if gov->init() fails this allocation is not released.
> dbs_data should be released in case if gov->init() failure.
> 
> Fixes: 714a2d9c8792 ("cpufreq: governor: split cpufreq_governor_dbs()")
> Signed-off-by: Navid Emamdoost <navid.emamdoost@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c | 4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
> index 4bb054d0cb43..deb099d36266 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
> @@ -428,8 +428,10 @@ int cpufreq_dbs_governor_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
>  	gov_attr_set_init(&dbs_data->attr_set, &policy_dbs->list);
>  
>  	ret = gov->init(dbs_data);
> -	if (ret)
> +	if (ret) {
> +		kfree(dbs_data);
>  		goto free_policy_dbs_info;

Maybe add another label right before kfree() at the bottom and jump there
instead. We wanted to share code in the error path.

> +	}
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * The sampling interval should not be less than the transition latency
> -- 
> 2.17.1

-- 
viresh