Re: [RFC][PATCH] kprobes/x86: While list ftrace locations in kprobe blacklist areas
From: Masami Hiramatsu
Date: Fri Oct 11 2019 - 04:39:36 EST
Hi Steve,
On Thu, 10 Oct 2019 17:52:16 -0400
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> I noticed some of my old tests failing on kprobes, and realized that
> this was due to black listing irq_entry functions on x86 from being
> used by kprobes. IIRC, this was due to the cr2 being corrupted and
> such, and I believe other things were to cause. But black listing all
> irq_entry code is a big hammer to this.
OK, I think if we can use ftrace for hooking, probing on "that address"
is good, but the function body still can not be probed.
>
> (See commit 0eae81dc9f026 "x86/kprobes: Prohibit probing on IRQ
> handlers directly" for more details)
>
> Anyway, if kprobes is using ftrace as a hook, there shouldn't be any
> problems here. If we white list ftrace locations in the range of
> kprobe_add_area_blacklist(), it should be safe.
Agreed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> diff --git a/kernel/kprobes.c b/kernel/kprobes.c
> index d9770a5393c8..9d28a279282c 100644
> --- a/kernel/kprobes.c
> +++ b/kernel/kprobes.c
> @@ -2124,6 +2124,11 @@ int kprobe_add_area_blacklist(unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
> int ret = 0;
>
> for (entry = start; entry < end; entry += ret) {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_KPROBES_ON_FTRACE
> + /* We are safe if using ftrace */
> + if (ftrace_location(entry))
> + continue;
> +#endif
Have you tested the patch? it doesn't measure the entry function's size.
(kprobe_add_ksym_blacklist(entry) returns the function size)
Could you do this in kprobe_add_ksym_blacklist()?
Instead of continue, increment ent->start_addr by MCOUNT size(?) will be OK.
(Note that since each blacklist symbol is managed independently, you can make
a "gap" between them as a safe area)
Thank you,
> ret = kprobe_add_ksym_blacklist(entry);
> if (ret < 0)
> return ret;
--
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx>