RE: [EXT] Re: [RESEND PATCH v5 4/4] mailbox: imx: add support for imx v1 mu

From: Richard Zhu
Date: Fri Oct 11 2019 - 21:12:33 EST

Next message: Gabriela Bittencourt: "[PATCH] staging: sm750fb: align arguments with open parenthesis"
Previous message: Anson Huang: "RE: [PATCH 1/2] net: fec_main: Use platform_get_irq_byname_optional() to avoid error message"
In reply to: Richard Zhu: "RE: [EXT] Re: [RESEND PATCH v5 4/4] mailbox: imx: add support for imx v1 mu"
Next in thread: Daniel Baluta: "Re: [EXT] Re: [RESEND PATCH v5 4/4] mailbox: imx: add support for imx v1 mu"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi Daniel:
New version patch-set had been sent out on Oct9.
https://patchwork.kernel.org/cover/11180683/

Best Regards
Richard Zhu

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richard Zhu
> Sent: 2019å10æ9æ 9:48
> To: Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: jassisinghbrar@xxxxxxxxx; Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
> Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@xxxxxxx>; Aisheng Dong
> <aisheng.dong@xxxxxxx>; dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@xxxxxxx>; Linux Kernel
> Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; linux-arm-kernel
> <linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: RE: [EXT] Re: [RESEND PATCH v5 4/4] mailbox: imx: add support for
> imx v1 mu
>
> Hi Daniel:
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: 2019å10æ8æ 15:26
> > To: Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu@xxxxxxx>
> > Cc: jassisinghbrar@xxxxxxxxx; Oleksij Rempel
> > <o.rempel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@xxxxxxx>;
> > Aisheng Dong <aisheng.dong@xxxxxxx>; dl-linux-imx
> <linux-imx@xxxxxxx>;
> > Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
> > linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Subject: [EXT] Re: [RESEND PATCH v5 4/4] mailbox: imx: add support for
> > imx v1 mu
> >
> >
> > Hi Richard,
> >
> > Can you please rebase and resend this patch series?
> >
> [Richard Zhu] No problem, I would resend this patch-set later.
>
>
> Best Regards
> Richard Zhu
>
> > On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 10:21 PM Daniel Baluta
> > <daniel.baluta@xxxxxxxxx>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 8:16 AM Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu@xxxxxxx>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > There is a version 1.0 MU on i.MX7ULP platform.
> > > > One new version ID register is added, and it's offset is 0.
> > > > TRn registers are defined at the offset 0x20 ~ 0x2C.
> > > > RRn registers are defined at the offset 0x40 ~ 0x4C.
> > > > SR/CR registers are defined at 0x60/0x64.
> > > > Extend this driver to support it.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu@xxxxxxx>
> > > > Suggested-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Dong Aisheng <aisheng.dong@xxxxxxx>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > Very clean solution. Thanks Richard!
> > >
> > > Reviewed-by: Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@xxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c | 55
> > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> > > > 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c
> > > > b/drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c index afe625e..2cdcdc5 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c
> > > > @@ -12,19 +12,11 @@
> > > > #include <linux/of_device.h>
> > > > #include <linux/slab.h>
> > > >
> > > > -/* Transmit Register */
> > > > -#define IMX_MU_xTRn(x) (0x00 + 4 * (x))
> > > > -/* Receive Register */
> > > > -#define IMX_MU_xRRn(x) (0x10 + 4 * (x))
> > > > -/* Status Register */
> > > > -#define IMX_MU_xSR 0x20
> > > > #define IMX_MU_xSR_GIPn(x) BIT(28 + (3 - (x)))
> > > > #define IMX_MU_xSR_RFn(x) BIT(24 + (3 - (x)))
> > > > #define IMX_MU_xSR_TEn(x) BIT(20 + (3 - (x)))
> > > > #define IMX_MU_xSR_BRDIP BIT(9)
> > > >
> > > > -/* Control Register */
> > > > -#define IMX_MU_xCR 0x24
> > > > /* General Purpose Interrupt Enable */
> > > > #define IMX_MU_xCR_GIEn(x) BIT(28 + (3 - (x)))
> > > > /* Receive Interrupt Enable */
> > > > @@ -44,6 +36,13 @@ enum imx_mu_chan_type {
> > > > IMX_MU_TYPE_RXDB, /* Rx doorbell */
> > > > };
> > > >
> > > > +struct imx_mu_dcfg {
> > > > + u32 xTR[4]; /* Transmit Registers */
> > > > + u32 xRR[4]; /* Receive Registers */
> > > > + u32 xSR; /* Status Register */
> > > > + u32 xCR; /* Control Register */
> > > > +};
> > > > +
> > > > struct imx_mu_con_priv {
> > > > unsigned int idx;
> > > > char
> > irq_desc[IMX_MU_CHAN_NAME_SIZE];
> > > > @@ -61,12 +60,27 @@ struct imx_mu_priv {
> > > > struct mbox_chan mbox_chans[IMX_MU_CHANS];
> > > >
> > > > struct imx_mu_con_priv con_priv[IMX_MU_CHANS];
> > > > + const struct imx_mu_dcfg *dcfg;
> > > > struct clk *clk;
> > > > int irq;
> > > >
> > > > bool side_b;
> > > > };
> > > >
> > > > +static const struct imx_mu_dcfg imx_mu_cfg_imx6sx = {
> > > > + .xTR = {0x0, 0x4, 0x8, 0xc},
> > > > + .xRR = {0x10, 0x14, 0x18, 0x1c},
> > > > + .xSR = 0x20,
> > > > + .xCR = 0x24,
> > > > +};
> > > > +
> > > > +static const struct imx_mu_dcfg imx_mu_cfg_imx7ulp = {
> > > > + .xTR = {0x20, 0x24, 0x28, 0x2c},
> > > > + .xRR = {0x40, 0x44, 0x48, 0x4c},
> > > > + .xSR = 0x60,
> > > > + .xCR = 0x64,
> > > > +};
> > > > +
> > > > static struct imx_mu_priv *to_imx_mu_priv(struct mbox_controller
> > > > *mbox) {
> > > > return container_of(mbox, struct imx_mu_priv, mbox); @@
> > > > -88,10 +102,10 @@ static u32 imx_mu_xcr_rmw(struct imx_mu_priv
> > > > *priv,
> > u32 set, u32 clr)
> > > > u32 val;
> > > >
> > > > spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->xcr_lock, flags);
> > > > - val = imx_mu_read(priv, IMX_MU_xCR);
> > > > + val = imx_mu_read(priv, priv->dcfg->xCR);
> > > > val &= ~clr;
> > > > val |= set;
> > > > - imx_mu_write(priv, val, IMX_MU_xCR);
> > > > + imx_mu_write(priv, val, priv->dcfg->xCR);
> > > > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->xcr_lock, flags);
> > > >
> > > > return val;
> > > > @@ -111,8 +125,8 @@ static irqreturn_t imx_mu_isr(int irq, void *p)
> > > > struct imx_mu_con_priv *cp = chan->con_priv;
> > > > u32 val, ctrl, dat;
> > > >
> > > > - ctrl = imx_mu_read(priv, IMX_MU_xCR);
> > > > - val = imx_mu_read(priv, IMX_MU_xSR);
> > > > + ctrl = imx_mu_read(priv, priv->dcfg->xCR);
> > > > + val = imx_mu_read(priv, priv->dcfg->xSR);
> > > >
> > > > switch (cp->type) {
> > > > case IMX_MU_TYPE_TX:
> > > > @@ -138,10 +152,10 @@ static irqreturn_t imx_mu_isr(int irq, void *p)
> > > > imx_mu_xcr_rmw(priv, 0,
> IMX_MU_xCR_TIEn(cp->idx));
> > > > mbox_chan_txdone(chan, 0);
> > > > } else if (val == IMX_MU_xSR_RFn(cp->idx)) {
> > > > - dat = imx_mu_read(priv, IMX_MU_xRRn(cp->idx));
> > > > + dat = imx_mu_read(priv, priv->dcfg->xRR[cp->idx]);
> > > > mbox_chan_received_data(chan, (void *)&dat);
> > > > } else if (val == IMX_MU_xSR_GIPn(cp->idx)) {
> > > > - imx_mu_write(priv, IMX_MU_xSR_GIPn(cp->idx),
> > IMX_MU_xSR);
> > > > + imx_mu_write(priv, IMX_MU_xSR_GIPn(cp->idx),
> > > > + priv->dcfg->xSR);
> > > > mbox_chan_received_data(chan, NULL);
> > > > } else {
> > > > dev_warn_ratelimited(priv->dev, "Not handled
> > > > interrupt\n"); @@ -159,7 +173,7 @@ static int
> > > > imx_mu_send_data(struct mbox_chan *chan, void *data)
> > > >
> > > > switch (cp->type) {
> > > > case IMX_MU_TYPE_TX:
> > > > - imx_mu_write(priv, *arg, IMX_MU_xTRn(cp->idx));
> > > > + imx_mu_write(priv, *arg,
> > > > + priv->dcfg->xTR[cp->idx]);
> > > > imx_mu_xcr_rmw(priv,
> IMX_MU_xCR_TIEn(cp->idx), 0);
> > > > break;
> > > > case IMX_MU_TYPE_TXDB:
> > > > @@ -270,7 +284,7 @@ static void imx_mu_init_generic(struct
> > > > imx_mu_priv
> > *priv)
> > > > return;
> > > >
> > > > /* Set default MU configuration */
> > > > - imx_mu_write(priv, 0, IMX_MU_xCR);
> > > > + imx_mu_write(priv, 0, priv->dcfg->xCR);
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > static int imx_mu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) @@ -278,6
> > > > +292,7 @@ static int imx_mu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > > struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> > > > struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
> > > > struct imx_mu_priv *priv;
> > > > + const struct imx_mu_dcfg *dcfg;
> > > > unsigned int i;
> > > > int ret;
> > > >
> > > > @@ -295,6 +310,11 @@ static int imx_mu_probe(struct
> > > > platform_device
> > *pdev)
> > > > if (priv->irq < 0)
> > > > return priv->irq;
> > > >
> > > > + dcfg = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
> > > > + if (!dcfg)
> > > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > > + priv->dcfg = dcfg;
> > > > +
> > > > priv->clk = devm_clk_get(dev, NULL);
> > > > if (IS_ERR(priv->clk)) {
> > > > if (PTR_ERR(priv->clk) != -ENOENT) @@ -348,7
> > > > +368,8 @@ static int imx_mu_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > static const struct of_device_id imx_mu_dt_ids[] = {
> > > > - { .compatible = "fsl,imx6sx-mu" },
> > > > + { .compatible = "fsl,imx7ulp-mu", .data =
> &imx_mu_cfg_imx7ulp },
> > > > + { .compatible = "fsl,imx6sx-mu", .data =
> > > > + &imx_mu_cfg_imx6sx },
> > > > { },
> > > > };
> > > > MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, imx_mu_dt_ids);
> > > > --
> > > > 2.7.4
> > > >

Next message: Gabriela Bittencourt: "[PATCH] staging: sm750fb: align arguments with open parenthesis"
Previous message: Anson Huang: "RE: [PATCH 1/2] net: fec_main: Use platform_get_irq_byname_optional() to avoid error message"
In reply to: Richard Zhu: "RE: [EXT] Re: [RESEND PATCH v5 4/4] mailbox: imx: add support for imx v1 mu"
Next in thread: Daniel Baluta: "Re: [EXT] Re: [RESEND PATCH v5 4/4] mailbox: imx: add support for imx v1 mu"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]