Re: [PATCH 1/4] KVM: VMX: rename {vmx,nested_vmx}_vcpu_setup functions

[Krish Sadhukhan]

On 10/15/2019 09:40 AM, Xiaoyao Li wrote:
> Rename {vmx,nested_vmx}_vcpu_setup to {vmx,nested_vmx}_vmcs_setup,
> to match what they really do.
>
> No functional change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>   arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c | 2 +-
>   arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.h | 2 +-
>   arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c    | 9 +++------
>   3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
> index 5e231da00310..7935422d311f 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
> @@ -5768,7 +5768,7 @@ static int vmx_set_nested_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>   	return ret;
>   }
>   
> -void nested_vmx_vcpu_setup(void)
> +void nested_vmx_vmcs_setup(void)
>   {
>   	if (enable_shadow_vmcs) {
>   		vmcs_write64(VMREAD_BITMAP, __pa(vmx_vmread_bitmap));
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.h b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.h
> index 187d39bf0bf1..2be1ba7482c9 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.h
> @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ void nested_vmx_setup_ctls_msrs(struct nested_vmx_msrs *msrs, u32 ept_caps,
>   				bool apicv);
>   void nested_vmx_hardware_unsetup(void);
>   __init int nested_vmx_hardware_setup(int (*exit_handlers[])(struct kvm_vcpu *));
> -void nested_vmx_vcpu_setup(void);
> +void nested_vmx_vmcs_setup(void);
>   void nested_vmx_free_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>   int nested_vmx_enter_non_root_mode(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool from_vmentry);
>   bool nested_vmx_exit_reflected(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 exit_reason);
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> index e660e28e9ae0..58b77a882426 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> @@ -4161,15 +4161,12 @@ static void ept_set_mmio_spte_mask(void)
>   
>   #define VMX_XSS_EXIT_BITMAP 0
>   
> -/*
> - * Sets up the vmcs for emulated real mode.
> - */
> -static void vmx_vcpu_setup(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx)
> +static void vmx_vmcs_setup(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx)
>   {
>   	int i;
>   
>   	if (nested)
> -		nested_vmx_vcpu_setup();
> +		nested_vmx_vmcs_setup();
>   
>   	if (cpu_has_vmx_msr_bitmap())
>   		vmcs_write64(MSR_BITMAP, __pa(vmx->vmcs01.msr_bitmap));
> @@ -6777,7 +6774,7 @@ static struct kvm_vcpu *vmx_create_vcpu(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned int id)
>   	cpu = get_cpu();
>   	vmx_vcpu_load(&vmx->vcpu, cpu);
>   	vmx->vcpu.cpu = cpu;
> -	vmx_vcpu_setup(vmx);
> +	vmx_vmcs_setup(vmx);
>   	vmx_vcpu_put(&vmx->vcpu);
>   	put_cpu();
>   	if (cpu_need_virtualize_apic_accesses(&vmx->vcpu)) {

May be we should rename vmx_vcpu_reset() to vmx_vmcs_reset() as well ?