On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 10:23:57AM +0000, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
"rcu_wait" is incorrct here, use "rcu_run" instead.
Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/rcu/tree.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index 278798e58698..c351fc280945 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -2485,7 +2485,7 @@ static void rcu_cpu_kthread(unsigned int cpu)
int spincnt;
for (spincnt = 0; spincnt < 10; spincnt++) {
- trace_rcu_utilization(TPS("Start CPU kthread@rcu_wait"));
+ trace_rcu_utilization(TPS("Start CPU kthread@rcu_run"));
local_bh_disable();
*statusp = RCU_KTHREAD_RUNNING;
local_irq_disable();
@@ -2496,7 +2496,7 @@ static void rcu_cpu_kthread(unsigned int cpu)
rcu_core();
local_bh_enable();
if (*workp == 0) {
- trace_rcu_utilization(TPS("End CPU kthread@rcu_wait"));
+ trace_rcu_utilization(TPS("End CPU kthread@rcu_run"));
This one needs to stay as it was because this is where we wait when out
of work.
So I took the first hunk and dropped this second hunk.
Please let me know if I am missing something.
Thanx, Paul
*statusp = RCU_KTHREAD_WAITING;
return;
}
--
2.20.1