On Wednesday 16 October 2019 10:31:13 Sasha Levin wrote:
On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 04:03:53PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Friday 30 August 2019 09:56:47 Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Thursday 29 August 2019 19:35:06 Sasha Levin wrote:
> > > With regards to missing specs/docs/whatever - our main concern with this
> > > release was that we want full interoperability, which is why the spec
> > > was made public as-is without modifications from what was used
> > > internally. There's no "secret sauce" that Microsoft is hiding here.
> >
> > Ok, if it was just drop of "current version" of documentation then it
> > makes sense.
> >
> > > How about we give this spec/code time to get soaked and reviewed for a
> > > bit, and if folks still feel (in a month or so?) that there are missing
> > > bits of information related to exfat, I'll be happy to go back and try
> > > to get them out as well.
>
> Hello Sasha!
>
> Now one month passed, so do you have some information when missing parts
> of documentation like TexFAT would be released to public?
Sure, I'll see if I can get an approval to open it up.
Ok!
Can I assume you will be implementing TexFAT support once the spec is
available?
I cannot promise that I would implement something which I do not know
how is working... It depends on how complicated TexFAT is and also how
future exfat support in kernel would look like.
But I'm interesting in implementing it.