[patch 2/2] x86/ioapic: Rename misnamed functions
From: Thomas Gleixner
Date: Thu Oct 17 2019 - 06:20:30 EST
ioapic_irqd_[un]mask() are misnomers as both functions do way more than
masking and unmasking the interrupt line. Both deal with the moving the
affinity of the interrupt within interrupt context. The mask/unmask is just
a tiny part of the functionality.
Rename them to ioapic_prepare/finish_move(), fixup the call sites and
rename the related variables in the code to reflect what this is about.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c | 16 ++++++++--------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
@@ -1725,7 +1725,7 @@ static bool io_apic_level_ack_pending(st
return false;
}
-static inline bool ioapic_irqd_mask(struct irq_data *data)
+static inline bool ioapic_prepare_move(struct irq_data *data)
{
/* If we are moving the irq we need to mask it */
if (unlikely(irqd_is_setaffinity_pending(data))) {
@@ -1736,9 +1736,9 @@ static inline bool ioapic_irqd_mask(stru
return false;
}
-static inline void ioapic_irqd_unmask(struct irq_data *data, bool masked)
+static inline void ioapic_finish_move(struct irq_data *data, bool moveit)
{
- if (unlikely(masked)) {
+ if (unlikely(moveit)) {
/* Only migrate the irq if the ack has been received.
*
* On rare occasions the broadcast level triggered ack gets
@@ -1773,11 +1773,11 @@ static inline void ioapic_irqd_unmask(st
}
}
#else
-static inline bool ioapic_irqd_mask(struct irq_data *data)
+static inline bool ioapic_prepare_move(struct irq_data *data)
{
return false;
}
-static inline void ioapic_irqd_unmask(struct irq_data *data, bool masked)
+static inline void ioapic_finish_move(struct irq_data *data, bool moveit)
{
}
#endif
@@ -1786,11 +1786,11 @@ static void ioapic_ack_level(struct irq_
{
struct irq_cfg *cfg = irqd_cfg(irq_data);
unsigned long v;
- bool masked;
+ bool moveit;
int i;
irq_complete_move(cfg);
- masked = ioapic_irqd_mask(irq_data);
+ moveit = ioapic_prepare_move(irq_data);
/*
* It appears there is an erratum which affects at least version 0x11
@@ -1845,7 +1845,7 @@ static void ioapic_ack_level(struct irq_
eoi_ioapic_pin(cfg->vector, irq_data->chip_data);
}
- ioapic_irqd_unmask(irq_data, masked);
+ ioapic_finish_move(irq_data, moveit);
}
static void ioapic_ir_ack_level(struct irq_data *irq_data)