[RFC PATCH v2 02/16] mm,madvise: call soft_offline_page() without MF_COUNT_INCREASED

From: Oscar Salvador
Date: Thu Oct 17 2019 - 10:22:23 EST


From: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

The call to get_user_pages_fast is only to get the pointer to a struct
page of a given address, pinning it is memory-poisoning handler's job,
so drop the refcount grabbed by get_user_pages_fast

Signed-off-by: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@xxxxxxx>
---
mm/madvise.c | 24 ++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/madvise.c b/mm/madvise.c
index 2be9f3fdb05e..89ed9a22ff4f 100644
--- a/mm/madvise.c
+++ b/mm/madvise.c
@@ -878,16 +878,24 @@ static int madvise_inject_error(int behavior,
*/
order = compound_order(compound_head(page));

- if (PageHWPoison(page)) {
- put_page(page);
+ /*
+ * The get_user_pages_fast() is just to get the pfn of the
+ * given address, and the refcount has nothing to do with
+ * what we try to test, so it should be released immediately.
+ * This is racy but it's intended because the real hardware
+ * errors could happen at any moment and memory error handlers
+ * must properly handle the race.
+ */
+ put_page(page);
+
+ if (PageHWPoison(page))
continue;
- }

if (behavior == MADV_SOFT_OFFLINE) {
pr_info("Soft offlining pfn %#lx at process virtual address %#lx\n",
pfn, start);

- ret = soft_offline_page(page, MF_COUNT_INCREASED);
+ ret = soft_offline_page(page, 0);
if (ret)
return ret;
continue;
@@ -895,14 +903,6 @@ static int madvise_inject_error(int behavior,

pr_info("Injecting memory failure for pfn %#lx at process virtual address %#lx\n",
pfn, start);
-
- /*
- * Drop the page reference taken by get_user_pages_fast(). In
- * the absence of MF_COUNT_INCREASED the memory_failure()
- * routine is responsible for pinning the page to prevent it
- * from being released back to the page allocator.
- */
- put_page(page);
ret = memory_failure(pfn, 0);
if (ret)
return ret;
--
2.12.3