Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: flush any pending policy update work scheduled before freeing

[Viresh Kumar]

On 18-10-19, 09:32, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Well, the policy is going away, so the governor has been stopped for
> it already.  Even if the limit is updated, it will not be used anyway,
> so why bother with updating it?

The hardware will be programmed to run on that frequency before the
policy exits, so I will say it will be used and the constraint will be
satisfied. And so I had that view.

-- 
viresh