Re: [RFT][PATCH 0/3] cpufreq / PM: QoS: Introduce frequency QoS and use it in cpufreq
From: Rafael J. Wysocki
Date: Fri Oct 18 2019 - 04:30:50 EST
On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 10:27 AM Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 18-10-19, 10:24, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 7:44 AM Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > On 17-10-19, 18:34, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > [BTW, Viresh, it looks like cpufreq_set_policy() should still ensure
> > > > that the new min is less than the new max, because the QoS doesn't do
> > > > that.]
> > >
> > > The ->verify() callback does that for us I believe.
> >
> > It does in practice AFAICS, but in theory it may assume the right
> > ordering between the min and the max and just test the boundaries, may
> > it not?
>
> I think cpufreq_verify_within_limits() gets called for sure from
> within ->verify() for all platforms
That's why I mean by "in practice". :-)