Re: [PATCH v8 4/8] powerpc/ima: add measurement rules to ima arch specific policy
From: Mimi Zohar
Date: Sat Oct 19 2019 - 20:17:31 EST
On Sat, 2019-10-19 at 14:06 -0400, Nayna Jain wrote:
> This patch adds the measurement rules to the arch specific policies on
> trusted boot enabled systems.
This version does not add rules to the existing arch specific policy,
but defines an arch specific trusted boot only policy and a combined
secure and trusted boot policy.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nayna Jain <nayna@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/kernel/ima_arch.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/ima_arch.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/ima_arch.c
> index 65d82ee74ea4..710872ea8f35 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/ima_arch.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/ima_arch.c
> @@ -26,6 +26,32 @@ static const char *const secure_rules[] = {
> NULL
> };
>
> +/*
> + * The "measure_rules" are enabled only on "trustedboot" enabled systems.
Please update the policy name to reflect the new "trusted_rules" name.
> + * These rules add the kexec kernel image and kernel modules file hashes to
> + * the IMA measurement list.
> + */
> +static const char *const trusted_rules[] = {
> + "measure func=KEXEC_KERNEL_CHECK",
> + "measure func=MODULE_CHECK",
> + NULL
> +};
> +
> +/*
> + * The "secure_and_trusted_rules" contains rules for both the secure boot and
> + * trusted boot. The "template=ima-modsig" option includes the appended
> + * signature, when available, in the IMA measurement list.
> + */
> +static const char *const secure_and_trusted_rules[] = {
> + "measure func=KEXEC_KERNEL_CHECK template=ima-modsig",
> + "measure func=MODULE_CHECK template=ima-modsig",
> + "appraise func=KEXEC_KERNEL_CHECK appraise_type=imasig|modsig",
> +#ifndef CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_FORCE
> + "appraise func=MODULE_CHECK appraise_type=imasig|modsig",
> +#endif
> + NULL
> +};
> +
> /*
> * Returns the relevant IMA arch-specific policies based on the system secure
> * boot state.
> @@ -33,7 +59,13 @@ static const char *const secure_rules[] = {
> const char *const *arch_get_ima_policy(void)
> {
> if (is_ppc_secureboot_enabled())
> - return secure_rules;
> + if (is_ppc_trustedboot_enabled())
> + return secure_and_trusted_rules;
> + else
> + return secure_rules;
> + else
> + if (is_ppc_trustedboot_enabled())
No need for the "if" statement to be on a separate line. ÂPlease
combine the "else" and "if" statements.
Mimi
> + return trusted_rules;
>
> return NULL;
> }