[PATCH v3 4/6] KVM: x86/vPMU: Introduce a new kvm_pmu_ops->msr_idx_to_pmc callback
From: Like Xu
Date: Tue Oct 22 2019 - 04:12:35 EST
Introduce a new callback msr_idx_to_pmc that returns a struct kvm_pmc*,
and change kvm_pmu_is_valid_msr to return ".msr_idx_to_pmc(vcpu, msr) ||
.is_valid_msr(vcpu, msr)" and AMD just returns false from .is_valid_msr.
Suggested-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Like Xu <like.xu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c | 3 ++-
arch/x86/kvm/pmu.h | 1 +
arch/x86/kvm/pmu_amd.c | 15 +++++++++++----
arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c | 13 +++++++++++++
4 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c
index de362ba0df01..39a259b701e0 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c
@@ -339,7 +339,8 @@ void kvm_pmu_deliver_pmi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
bool kvm_pmu_is_valid_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr)
{
- return kvm_x86_ops->pmu_ops->is_valid_msr(vcpu, msr);
+ return kvm_x86_ops->pmu_ops->msr_idx_to_pmc(vcpu, msr) ||
+ kvm_x86_ops->pmu_ops->is_valid_msr(vcpu, msr);
}
int kvm_pmu_get_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr, u64 *data)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.h b/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.h
index c3faa70d9886..3b4f1942d206 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.h
@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ struct kvm_pmu_ops {
struct kvm_pmc *(*pmc_idx_to_pmc)(struct kvm_pmu *pmu, int pmc_idx);
struct kvm_pmc *(*rdpmc_idx_to_pmc)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
unsigned int idx, u64 *mask);
+ struct kvm_pmc *(*msr_idx_to_pmc)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr);
int (*is_valid_rdpmc_idx)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int idx);
bool (*is_valid_msr)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr);
int (*get_msr)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr, u64 *data);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/pmu_amd.c b/arch/x86/kvm/pmu_amd.c
index 759b090f8140..88fe3f5f5bd1 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/pmu_amd.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/pmu_amd.c
@@ -199,14 +199,20 @@ static struct kvm_pmc *amd_rdpmc_idx_to_pmc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
}
static bool amd_is_valid_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr)
+{
+ /* please use kvm_pmu_is_valid_msr() instead */
+ return false;
+}
+
+struct kvm_pmc *amd_msr_idx_to_pmc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr)
{
struct kvm_pmu *pmu = vcpu_to_pmu(vcpu);
- int ret = false;
+ struct kvm_pmc *pmc;
- ret = get_gp_pmc_amd(pmu, msr, PMU_TYPE_COUNTER) ||
- get_gp_pmc_amd(pmu, msr, PMU_TYPE_EVNTSEL);
+ pmc = get_gp_pmc_amd(pmu, msr, PMU_TYPE_COUNTER);
+ pmc = pmc ? pmc : get_gp_pmc_amd(pmu, msr, PMU_TYPE_EVNTSEL);
- return ret;
+ return pmc;
}
static int amd_pmu_get_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr, u64 *data)
@@ -308,6 +314,7 @@ struct kvm_pmu_ops amd_pmu_ops = {
.pmc_is_enabled = amd_pmc_is_enabled,
.pmc_idx_to_pmc = amd_pmc_idx_to_pmc,
.rdpmc_idx_to_pmc = amd_rdpmc_idx_to_pmc,
+ .msr_idx_to_pmc = amd_msr_idx_to_pmc,
.is_valid_rdpmc_idx = amd_is_valid_rdpmc_idx,
.is_valid_msr = amd_is_valid_msr,
.get_msr = amd_pmu_get_msr,
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c
index 8b999dae15f2..714afcd9244c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c
@@ -162,6 +162,18 @@ static bool intel_is_valid_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr)
return ret;
}
+struct kvm_pmc *intel_msr_idx_to_pmc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr)
+{
+ struct kvm_pmu *pmu = vcpu_to_pmu(vcpu);
+ struct kvm_pmc *pmc;
+
+ pmc = get_fixed_pmc(pmu, msr);
+ pmc = pmc ? pmc : get_gp_pmc(pmu, msr, MSR_P6_EVNTSEL0);
+ pmc = pmc ? pmc : get_gp_pmc(pmu, msr, MSR_IA32_PERFCTR0);
+
+ return pmc;
+}
+
static int intel_pmu_get_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr, u64 *data)
{
struct kvm_pmu *pmu = vcpu_to_pmu(vcpu);
@@ -367,6 +379,7 @@ struct kvm_pmu_ops intel_pmu_ops = {
.pmc_is_enabled = intel_pmc_is_enabled,
.pmc_idx_to_pmc = intel_pmc_idx_to_pmc,
.rdpmc_idx_to_pmc = intel_rdpmc_idx_to_pmc,
+ .msr_idx_to_pmc = intel_msr_idx_to_pmc,
.is_valid_rdpmc_idx = intel_is_valid_rdpmc_idx,
.is_valid_msr = intel_is_valid_msr,
.get_msr = intel_pmu_get_msr,
--
2.21.0