On Tue 22-10-19 08:52:28, David Hildenbrand wrote:
On 21.10.19 19:23, David Hildenbrand wrote:
Two cleanups that popped up while working on (and discussing) virtio-mem:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/9/19/463
Tested with DIMMs on x86.
As discussed with michal in v1, I'll soon look into removing the use
of PG_reserved during memory onlining completely - most probably
disallowing to offline memory blocks with holes, cleaning up the
onlining+offlining code.
BTW, I remember that ZONE_DEVICE pages are still required to be set
PG_reserved. That has to be sorted out first.
Do they?
I remember that somebody was
working on it a while ago but didn't hear about that again. Will look into
that as well - should be as easy as adding a zone check (if there isn't a
pfn_to_online_page() check already). But of course, there might be special
cases ....
I remember Alexander didn't want to change the PageReserved handling
because he was worried about unforeseeable side effects. I have a vague
recollection he (or maybe Dan) has promissed some follow up clean ups
which didn't seem to materialize.