Re: [PATCH] i2c: i2c-stm32f7: rework slave_id allocation

From: Pierre Yves MORDRET
Date: Tue Oct 22 2019 - 09:42:04 EST


Hello

Looks good

Reviewed-by: Pierre-Yves MORDRET <pierre-yves.mordret@xxxxxx>

Thx
Regards

On 10/15/19 3:03 PM, Alain Volmat wrote:
> The IP can handle two slave addresses. One address can either be
> 7 bits or 10 bits while the other can only be 7 bits.
> In order to ensure that a 10 bits address can always be allocated
> (assuming there is only one 7 bits address already allocated),
> pick up the 7-bits only address slot in priority when performing a 7-bits
> address allocation.
>
> Fixes: 60d609f3 ("i2c: i2c-stm32f7: Add slave support")
>
> Signed-off-by: Alain Volmat <alain.volmat@xxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-stm32f7.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-stm32f7.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-stm32f7.c
> index d36cf08461f7..cfae01b15243 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-stm32f7.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-stm32f7.c
> @@ -1265,7 +1265,7 @@ static int stm32f7_i2c_get_free_slave_id(struct stm32f7_i2c_dev *i2c_dev,
> * slave[0] supports 7-bit and 10-bit slave address
> * slave[1] supports 7-bit slave address only
> */
> - for (i = 0; i < STM32F7_I2C_MAX_SLAVE; i++) {
> + for (i = STM32F7_I2C_MAX_SLAVE - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
> if (i == 1 && (slave->flags & I2C_CLIENT_PEC))
> continue;
> if (!i2c_dev->slave[i]) {
>