Re: [PATCH] docs/core-api: memory-allocation: mention size helpers

[Chris Packham]

Hi Jon,

On Tue, 2019-10-22 at 07:19 -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Oct 2019 10:27:47 +1300
> Chris Packham <chris.packham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > Mention struct_size(), array_size() and array3_size() in the same place
> > as kmalloc() and friends.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Chris Packham <chris.packham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  Documentation/core-api/memory-allocation.rst | 4 +++-
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/Documentation/core-api/memory-allocation.rst b/Documentation/core-api/memory-allocation.rst
> > index e59779aa7615..6a131767becd 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/core-api/memory-allocation.rst
> > +++ b/Documentation/core-api/memory-allocation.rst
> > @@ -91,7 +91,9 @@ The most straightforward way to allocate memory is to use a function
> >  from the :c:func:`kmalloc` family. And, to be on the safe side it's
> >  best to use routines that set memory to zero, like
> >  :c:func:`kzalloc`. If you need to allocate memory for an array, there
> > -are :c:func:`kmalloc_array` and :c:func:`kcalloc` helpers.
> > +are :c:func:`kmalloc_array` and :c:func:`kcalloc` helpers. The helpers
> > +:c:func:`struct_size`, :c:func:`array_size` and :c:func:`array3_size` can be
> > +used to safely calculate object sizes without overflowing.
> 
> Quick comment: we don't need :c:func: anymore; the markup happens anyway.
> So rather than adding more of them, could I ask you to please take out the
> ones that are there now?

So just with backquotes i.e. :c:func:`kmalloc` becomes `kmalloc`?

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> jon